## Friday, February 27, 2009

## Thursday, February 26, 2009

### More Exam Responses

*More of Crayons' Term II exam responses.*

*Book: Canada Eh to Zed*

*Question: What are some Canadian things starting with the letters V, W, X, Y or Z?*

Xylograph; Yoho – it means “awesome” in Cree; That thing that smooths out the ice [Zamboni];

X-Country Skiing; Zipper; Zed!

*Memory work: Sing the first verse of "Like a River Glorious." Repeat the introductory section to the Lord's Prayer (Luther's Small Catechism).*

"How did you do?" "Yoho!"

*Geography: Show these things on a globe: Arctic Circle, England, France*

*Pilgrim's Progress: Crayons decided to tell about the meeting with the shepherds.*

Christian and Hopeful go along and they meet some shepherds.

And the shepherds tell him, “You’re not very far, you know. Some other people have gone way, way farther than you have, but then they’ve just fallen into darkness. Let us show you.”

So Christian and Hopeful go along with the shepherds and the shepherds show them Hell’s Door. It was a shortcut for Hell. And then they showed Christian and Hopeful a big cliff, and they almost fell off because it was so frightening. There were dead men’s bodies down there. And Christian asked, “Is there any hotel or anything where we could stay?” And the shepherds said, “We are your entertainment. You can stay in our huts. You can sleep in our beds.” So that night Christian and Hopeful slept in the shepherds’ house.

*Book of Matthew: Tell the story of the Resurrection.*

*[My note: Crayons may not have told this story in perfect detail, but I think she got the main ideas right.]*

Jesus was put in a grave, and there was a rock in front of the grave, and there were guards in front of the rock that was in front of the grave. But one day there was a bright light, and the rock moved out of the way, and the guards ran away. And pretty soon the guards came back, only to find Jesus’ body stolen. But then the guards ran away again. And then some women came. It was Mary and Mary Magnolia [Magdalene]. And then they saw two angels, one at the foot where Jesus’ body should be, and the other at the top of where Jesus’ body should be. And then Mary saw somebody who looked as if he was gardening. And she said, “have you stolen my master’s body?” And then he says no. And Mary recognizes Jesus’ voice, and she cries out, “Master!” And he cries, “Mary.” And she and Mary Magnolia ran out, saying “Jesus is alive! Jesus is alive!” The end.

*Reading: Read aloud "Time, You Old Gipsy Man" by Ralph Hodgson.*

*A Wonder Book, by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Story: "The Chimaera." Question: Tell how Bellerophon caught Pegasus.*

Bellerophon and the little boy watched always for Pegasus. Finally one day, the little boy said, “Look, Bellerophon, up in the sky!” And Bellerophon looked in the reflection of the water, and he saw a beautiful bird. “What a beautiful bird!” he said. “Don’t you understand, dear Bellerophon? That is no beautiful bird. That is Pegasus!” And Bellerophon saw that it was a beautiful Pegasus, with silvery wings. Quickly they went into some shrubbery and hid. The beautiful Pegasus came down, and it drank the water refreshingly, because no kind of water did he like more than the beautiful waters of Pirene. And then it just nibbled a little teeny bit on the daisies. Because it didn’t like to make a big meal because he thought that the daisies up on this mountain place where he lived were better.

Then he saw that the beautiful Pegasus was dancing the most beautiful dance he had ever seen. Quickly, as the Pegasus slowed down his dance, he ran out of the shrubbery, holding the beautiful halter in his hand. And he put it on Pegasus. And quickly jumped on Pegasus’ back. Pegasus, never feeling human weight before, leapt up in the air! Up, up, up and away. And all of a sudden Bellerophon came down!!! And the Pegasus began to fly once more again. But as soon as it calmed down…not really too calmed down…he looked at it and saw that such a beautiful creature should be free. He remembered the dance that it danced, he remembered the water it had drunk with refreshment, he remembered the daisies he had nibbled delicately.

So he slipped off the halter, and he said, “Go free, Pegasus.” Quickly Pegasus soared up in the air as Bellerophon watched it sadly. But all of a sudden Pegasus came down, and again Bellerophon said, “Go, Pegasus. Go to your world of wonders.” But Pegasus would not move. He said, “Good Pegasus.” And he put the halter on it and rode it. The End.

*History: Tell about your group's trip to a historic site.*

*[My note: I noticed that in this narration, Crayons used a much more limited second-grader's reporting style, typical of what schoolchildren would put in a report for the teacher. It's interesting that although she had a good time on the field trip, it didn't seem to offer her much material for storytelling.]*

I went to [the house] and I put on a 1891 dress. And then we played school, learning capitals and writing with ink.

And then we had a tour of the house. And we talked about oatmeal, we got to pump water with a water pump. We would play croquet and cricket, and we were back in 1891.

*History (100 Years War): Tell what you know of the Hundred Years War.*

There was the battle of Sluys, the battle of Crecy, there was the battle of Calais, and the battle of…something else that starts with P. [Poitiers]

I’ll tell you about the battle of Calais. It was a starving war. And there were these enemies that surrounded Calais, and the people of Calais couldn’t even go out to gather food from their crops. And finally they got so starved that they ate their cats and dogs. And finally they waved their white flag. And soldiers came and said, “You are really ready to surrender?” They said, “Please try and coax your king, and you will have a reward.” So the knights went and tried to coax the king into letting all of the people go free.

So the king said, “Tell them this.” So the knights went, and they said, “The king said that the only deal he’ll make is that six men come out in their nightclothes, nightcaps and all, with ropes around their necks, bearing the keys of the city.” And the governor of Calais said, “Aw, but we can’t do that!” So he went and told the people about what the king had said. And they said, “But, but, we can’t do that! There’s nobody brave enough to do that, and nobody strong enough to do that.” But finally a rich person said, “I will be the first of the six people to go.” And soon five more joined, and they had six people. And at dawn they all came out in their nightclothes and nightcaps and all, with ropes around their necks, bearing the keys of the city with them. And quickly the knights took them with them, to the king. And the king said, “I shall kill you.” But then all the knights began to beg and beg, but he said “No, no, no, no…no.”

But finally the queen fell down on her knees and begged, “I’ve never asked you a favour, but now I want to have these people.” And he said, “All right.” So she took them to her own rooms, and she dressed them, and then she had a banquet for them. And the next morning she let them go to Calais, and that was the end.

## Wednesday, February 25, 2009

### Another CPSIA Quote

"When you have to consult a lawyer before you hold a church benefit sale, YOU ARE NOT IN AMERICA. When you live in fear that some rogue group of logically-impaired self-appointed safety nannies who have the ear of the powerful are going to take you down for selling pewter crosses, YOU ARE NOT IN AMERICA. When your customer wants you to add non-slip fabric to the soles of their custom toddler booties and you have to advise her to do it herself because you haven't had such fabric tested, YOU ARE NOT IN AMERICA."-- "Get outraged at THIS, Rep. Schakowsky", posted at Organic Baby Farm.

Labels:
CPSIA

### Wasting the Weasels (Exam Response)

*Crayons gave this narration today as part of her Term Two exams. It's one of the last chapters from The Wind in the Willows.*

Toad Hall was being taken over by people from the Wild Woods. And so Rat and Mole and Toad and Badger armed themselves to go and take over Toad Hall themselves. So Mole, who hadn’t been there all day, all of a sudden came back, and he told them that he had gone and told the Wild Woods animals that they were coming, and they were like, “Oh Mole, did you have to? That wasn’t a very good idea.” But all of a sudden Badger rose and said, yes it was a good idea. Because Mole just said, “I told them that we were coming in the back, on our way from the Wild Woods.” And the Badger said that was a good idea. So now all the Wild Woods animals were going to be watching from the windows on the way to the Wild Woods.

And Badger said, “I know of a tunnel that Toad’s Father told me about, and he said to me, don’t tell my son about it unless it’s great danger.” So Toad said, “Oh, I remember! Do you mean…the entrance…there was a squeaky board in the butler’s pantry.” And Badger said yes, that was it. “But we are going to use that. And we’re going to spring up. “And the Weasels are going to be having a party, I heard,” said the Mole. “So let’s go spring up on them.”

So Badger led them the way through the tunnel. There were many bumpings and scratchings, so that Rat thought they were being attacked, just because Toad was putting on airs of pride, not watching out where he was going, because he was so proud of himself. And Badger scolded Toad because he was putting on airs of pride. Finally they got there, and they lifted up the squeaky board in the butler’s pantry, and they realized that they were right next to the place where the Weasels were having a party. And Badger said, “One…”

Then they heard a Weasel’s voice from the next room saying, “I would like to make a small song about Toad…of course you all know TOAD…” All the Weasels were roaring with laughter. “Good Toad! Honest Toad! Modest Toad!” Now all the Weasels were roaring even more with laughter. “Now let me sing you the little song of TOAD!”

And he went "Mi-mi-mi-mi-mi…" And then the Chief Weasel began…”Toad he went a pleasuring down the walk so green…”

“Two…” said the Badger.

“And Toad was so green that he didn’t notice the walk…”

“Three!” said the Badger. “Go get ‘em!”

With that, they all ran into the room, sticks thrashing! Wap, wap, wap! And the Weasels were so frightened and because of Mole’s little visit (Mole had told them that there were going to be thousands of Toads, thousands of Moles, thousands of Badgers and thousands of Water Rats), and they had been so frightened by that remark that they almost saw thousands of Toads, thousands of Badgers, thousands of Moles, thousands of Water Rats. And they felt so dizzy and drunk that it looked so much, so much like all those thousands…and the Weasels weren’t even armed! And Toad began to jump around and yelled, “Toad he went a pleasuring? I’ll pleasure ‘em!” So they chased all the Weasels away, and then Mole and the Water Rat went and got the stoats and everything that was keeping watch. So when all the Wild Woods creatures had gone, they woke up some of the ones that they had knocked down with their sticks on the floor, and they made them clean, so they would have fresh bedspreads that night.

The End!

Labels:
Ambleside Online,
Books,
Crayons' Grade Two,
exams,
narrating,
Wind in the Willows

### Bamma and Bampa? Babcia or Bubbie?

What did you call your grandparents?

What do your children call their grandparents, or great-grandparents?

Some families use ethnic words for grandma and grandpa. Some go with "Grandma Brown" or "Grandpa Joe." Some choose completely personal nicknames, especially when there are multiple grandmas or grandpas around. Some of the nicknames come out of children's mispronunciations; my FarAwaySis could only manage "Bamma" and "Bampa" as a toddler.

My own children called my mother "Grandma Soup." The only reason for that--besides distinguishing her from their other grandmother--was that when The Apprentice was very small, my mother used to come babysit her sometimes, and stay for lunch, and lunch was usually...soup. So--Grandma-who-comes-for-soup, Grandma Soup.

Here's a list of all kinds of other possibilities.

What do your children call their grandparents, or great-grandparents?

Some families use ethnic words for grandma and grandpa. Some go with "Grandma Brown" or "Grandpa Joe." Some choose completely personal nicknames, especially when there are multiple grandmas or grandpas around. Some of the nicknames come out of children's mispronunciations; my FarAwaySis could only manage "Bamma" and "Bampa" as a toddler.

My own children called my mother "Grandma Soup." The only reason for that--besides distinguishing her from their other grandmother--was that when The Apprentice was very small, my mother used to come babysit her sometimes, and stay for lunch, and lunch was usually...soup. So--Grandma-who-comes-for-soup, Grandma Soup.

Here's a list of all kinds of other possibilities.

### Learning Resources has a good resource page, or, How'd you like his job? (CPSIA)

The front page of the Learning Resources website has a large link to their page of resources and contact info on the CPSIA. They also have a blog devoted to this issue, although it hasn't been updated since February 12th.

"Is it just me (okay, it's probably just me), or are we being overwhelmed with critical information and rulings on a daily basis, to the point where it is impossible on a practical basis to even READ them? I have noticed my hours of operation becoming more and more odd (check out the hours that I post my blogs, keeping in mind that I live in Chicago and not by nature nocturnal) and as I attempt to keep abreast of developments (impossible) and do my day job (what day job?), I fall further and further behind. As anyone who knows me will attest, I am able to manage a fairly robust workload - but this is simply ridiculous, especially if you consider the absolutely critical nature of the challenge.

"This has been on my mind increasingly in recent days as the deluge of releases from the CPSC cascade over my inbox. There are critical rules I have not read that directly affect our business and this effort. I am running out of hours. . . ."--Rick Woldenberg, Chairman - Learning Resources Inc.

Labels:
CPSIA

### This sums it all up (CPSIA)

Please read what the Deputy Headmistress has to say. We can mourn our nice old books, and oh, it's fun too taking pictures of them--but the whole thing goes way beyond that. It's wrong, it's unfair, it's causing problems for those it was supposedly meant to help--and it seems to be more a question of Great Big Politicking than anything else.

Did I get that right?

Did I get that right?

Labels:
CPSIA

### Yes, they're out there (CPSIA)

What was it the newscaster said? They're out there watching. And now they're right at the door.

Even in the rosary aisle.

Even in the rosary aisle.

Labels:
CPSIA

## Tuesday, February 24, 2009

### "Everybody got a chance to bounce it"--Stories of the Depression

The Toronto Star recently ran a five-day series of interviews with people who lived through the Great Depression.

Some quotes:

"She thought back to the first flat they rented in Kensington Market nine years before, when they arrived in Toronto. That apartment had three rooms. Her parents slept in one. Another held the piano and fancy furniture reserved for company. A curtain drawn across part of the kitchen cordoned off the area where Claire and her sister Eileen bunked."--"Black Family Beat Depression-Era Odds"

"In those days, welfare was not cash money. They gave you a certificate," he says. "And you could take it to the grocery store and you could get turnips and potatoes." A grocer was just up the street from their home but Helen Thomas refused to shop there with a relief note. "He's a talker," she would say. "He'll tell all our neighbours we're on welfare.""--"16 Years Old, $6 a Week"

"The McLetchies were one of the few families on their street that still celebrated children’s birthdays. One year, Marjorie’s gift was a rubber ball. “I was so afraid that one of the other kids would run off with it,” she says. “Mother used to come out and play with us. She made sure that everybody got a chance to bounce it.”"--"In the Depression, better off meant sharing"

"Chicken was in short supply, so in the pages of the Star you could find food writer Jessie Marie De Both's recipe for Mock Chicken Legs with Grilled Tomato and Spaghetti, where pork and veal stood in for poultry, and a skewer stood in for the bone. Loblaws was selling mock chicken for five cents a leg in 1934, according to an ad in the Star. "Everyone may have a drumstick when mock chicken legs are served," the ad said."--"Mock meals: Feeding a family in the Depression"

Some quotes:

"She thought back to the first flat they rented in Kensington Market nine years before, when they arrived in Toronto. That apartment had three rooms. Her parents slept in one. Another held the piano and fancy furniture reserved for company. A curtain drawn across part of the kitchen cordoned off the area where Claire and her sister Eileen bunked."--"Black Family Beat Depression-Era Odds"

"In those days, welfare was not cash money. They gave you a certificate," he says. "And you could take it to the grocery store and you could get turnips and potatoes." A grocer was just up the street from their home but Helen Thomas refused to shop there with a relief note. "He's a talker," she would say. "He'll tell all our neighbours we're on welfare.""--"16 Years Old, $6 a Week"

"The McLetchies were one of the few families on their street that still celebrated children’s birthdays. One year, Marjorie’s gift was a rubber ball. “I was so afraid that one of the other kids would run off with it,” she says. “Mother used to come out and play with us. She made sure that everybody got a chance to bounce it.”"--"In the Depression, better off meant sharing"

"Chicken was in short supply, so in the pages of the Star you could find food writer Jessie Marie De Both's recipe for Mock Chicken Legs with Grilled Tomato and Spaghetti, where pork and veal stood in for poultry, and a skewer stood in for the bone. Loblaws was selling mock chicken for five cents a leg in 1934, according to an ad in the Star. "Everyone may have a drumstick when mock chicken legs are served," the ad said."--"Mock meals: Feeding a family in the Depression"

Labels:
Canada,
Food,
Frugality,
history,
Quote for the Day

### A Family Journey Through Miquon Math

In 1996 we started using Miquon Math with our kindergarten-aged Apprentice. A couple of years later, now with an Internet connection and making all kinds of online discoveries, I found the Miquon-Key e-mail list. Unfortunately my first stint on the list came to a quick close as the Apprentice rebelled against Miquon (too much, too long, wasn't working anymore), and we moved on. But when Ponytails got to first grade, I resubscribed; and at the same time, I found new ways of working with the curriculum and wanted to share them with the list.

With permission of the list owner, I've dug out some of those posts--mostly for my own benefit, as Crayons is doing the same math now that Ponytails was a few years ago. I've edited them to use our blog nicknames and to take out some repetitive details. I've also added links to things I posted here after we started the blog.

The sequence of the six Miquon Math workbooks is Orange, Red, Blue, Green, Yellow and Purple. The average speed on them for most homeschoolers is about two workbooks a year.

The teacher's manuals for the program are the

This is our fourth year using Miquon and I never imagined there was a loop just for us. I've been reading through the posts and I already see I'm in good company. Our Apprentice just started the yellow book today. She loves the rods, but doing operations with them doesn't make sense to her. She loves the books, likes adding and multiplying (HATES subtracting), but would rather use a hundred chart, break-apart cubes, two rulers one above the other (anybody tried that? it's a "magic adding machine"), turning a question into a word problem, just about anything except putting two rods together and figuring out how long they are.

I can't take credit for this idea--I got it from a library book but I can't remember which one! You need two rulers, metric works best because there are more numbers. I use two identical transparent ones. This idea doesn't work well with very young children, but school age children find it fun.

To add 3+12, set the rulers against one another so that the 3 on the upper one is above the 0 on the lower one. Find the 12 on the lower ruler, and whatever number is above the 12 is the answer! To subtract 10-7, place the 10 on the upper ruler over the 7 on the lower one. Find the 0 on the lower ruler, and whatever number is above the 0 is the difference.

We started the Yellow Book this fall and for some reason we just can't get into it; my daughter groans "oh no, Miquon" when I get the book out. We are playing a lot of math games, doing questions with a muffin tin and macaroni (if you put 10 pieces in each compartment, you can do addition and subtraction up to 120) and with coloured cubes and pieces of coloured paper for the units, tens and hundreds (if I give you 5 cubes for the blue tens "column" and 4 for the red units "column", what number do you have? and if I give you 3 more for the blue and 7 for the red?--regrouping is necessary here)....

I never saw anyone as sure yesterday that 48-30 equalled 2 (on D-21). She took away the three tens and then insisted that you had to do something with two (I think she was thinking 10-8). I had to get the muffin tin out and prove the answer was 18, and I still don't think she believed me.

I read a very interesting article by Ruth Beechick (I think it was in her

Later she suggested that if they learned some of those facts they wouldn't have to refer to the tables all the time, and again the idea caught on; the kids saw the usefulness of carrying the facts around in their heads instead of on their papers. I don't know how well they all learned their times tables, but I'm sure that was a happier classroom than the one in "Hans Christian Andersen!" (If you never saw the movie, the schoolchildren are droning "two and two are four, four and four are eight...")

In spite of my complaints [about the Yellow book], we have found one way to make some of the addition and subtraction a little clearer (for example, page E-53, which is addition and subtraction with a sum or difference of 100, 200, 1000, etc.) We get out our pile of pennies, dimes and Canadian dollar coins, and do the problems as if they were money.

We have a couple of favourite scenarios we use with this. One is "you had this much money in your piggy bank this morning. Your sister came along and "borrowed" a few coins. When you came back later, you found you only had so much money left. How much exactly did she take?"

The opposite is, "you had this much money; grandpa came for a visit and slipped a few coins in; when you counted all your money you found you had this much; so how much money did he put in?"

One problem was x + 32 = 100. My dd didn't know how to do this mentally, so I said, "Pretend I'm 30 years old. In how many years will I be 100?" "70," she said. "Now it's two years later; I'm 32 years old. Now how many years will it be until I'm 100?" "About 72" she said. "Really? But two years ago you told me it would only be 70 years. How can it be more now?" She thought about this, and then decided 68 made more sense.

I'm starting Miquon again with renewed enthusiasm for the program, and I'm trying to use it more creatively. One difference from our first time through is that Ponytails is a bit older than The Apprentice was when she started the workbooks.

Another difference this time around is that Ponytails has had lots of experience playing with rods over the last couple of years. She's not quite comfortable yet thinking of them in terms of their actual length; she thinks of them as a blue rod or a green rod, not as a four or a five; but I think actually that's good; it means she can think about them for themselves without worrying too much yet what they represent.

I inadvertently found a way to heighten Ponytails' interest in learning the lengths of Cuisenaire rods. This morning I held up a yellow rod and asked her how many white rods long it would be. She said four. I said "Okay--prove it." She took the bait and said, "Okay then--I WILL." She lined up the white rods and admitted that she needed five. When I held up a light green and asked how many whites that would take, she said, "Three--and I'll PROVE it to you." And she did. We continued like that, and she kept on PROVING stuff to me--and the math got done.

I found a homemade substitute for the wooden rod tubes described in the

Cut a piece of index card to a 10 cm length and wrap it fairly tightly around an orange rod, trying to crease the edges as you go (to keep the rectangular shape). Secure each end well with tape, and there you go. I made four in under 10 minutes. They're obviously not made to last forever, but at that price they could be replaced easily when needed.

The purpose of the tubes, if you don't have the

We use these for a lot of things (besides giving the toddler something to play with

Young children can use them to do patterns with--two reds, a blue, two reds, a blue. You can draw a pattern with markers and have them copy it.

You can build things with them besides just straight trains. Build a 3-D model for the child to copy, something made out of several cubes stuck together. (Easy to do with Duplo or Lego too.)

You can use them to visualize word problems; for instance, you can use a piece of green construction paper to represent a field, and use some white cubes to represent sheep in the field--for counting, adding, subtracting. Or a blue piece with different coloured "fish".

We also use them to play a simple guessing game at about the K-1 level. You snap a few together (5 or 6), hold it behind your back and break a couple off; hold out the remaining piece and have the child guess how many are still behind your back. (You can do the break-off game with Duplo or Lego blocks too. Anything that snaps. Or even with small groups of non-joining objects, such as crayons or coins.)

And I suppose you could use them for actually measuring things.

....I have to say, I am more impressed than ever with Miquon and I'm glad I chose it for my first grader (I might have been discouraged after my older one's so-so experience).

The amazing part of this that we are doing a maximum of 20 minutes of math a day, doing a lot of rod games and the sorts of short activities suggested in First Grade Diary, and Ponytails is NEVERTHELESS picking up not only addition concepts but has started subtraction as well and ENJOYS it.

What a great program this is. I keep wondering why I see all these entire unused sets of Miquon at used curriculum sales; it makes me wonder if people just give up too soon.

On the difficulty of problems such as x - 3 = 2:

Ponytails and I played around with some problems like this today using coloured popsicle sticks and a small empty box which had originally contained frozen chicken wings. I put six popsicle sticks in the box without showing her how many, and said "I was all by myself for dinner and I was hungry, so I took out four chicken wings to cook. (I removed four sticks.) The next time I looked in the box (I showed her), there were two left. How many were there before I ate all those chicken wings?" She looked at the two in the box and the four on the table and said "six." We repeated this with some different sets of numbers, and she had no trouble with that.

Then we went to our blackboard and I drew an empty square and told her that was for "something." I wrote the problem "Something" - 4 = 2, and reminded her about the "chicken wings." I also showed her again with the appropriate Cuisenaire rods. She caught on to that quickly. I did one more simple one with her, and then she wanted to write one. She wrote "Something" - 5 = 10. I asked her, "Do you know how to do that one?" She wasn't sure. I took a yellow and an orange rod and said, "here's our 5, and here's our 10." She still wasn't sure how much that would be, so I had her figure out how long they would be together in white rods, and she got it.

I notice in the

I asked Ponytails if she knew what odd and even numbers were, and she said, "One is odd. Two is even. Three is odd. Four is even, and like that." I asked her if she knew how you know if something is an odd number, and she gave me a pretty hilarious explanation that I can't even try to reproduce here. (Some of our adult explanations must sound just like that to her.)

So obviously she does have some idea that some numbers are odd or even, but doesn't really understand what that means.....One explanation given in the Miquon materials was that you can build an even number with red rods, but an odd number you can't. I also saw an arrangement of cubes (similar to an activity in

I've noticed that some topics are covered VERY briefly in the Miquon worksheets, for instance, skip counting. In the Red Book, page F-15 is a dot to dot based on counting by 3's; F-18 is counting by 4's; F-21 is counting by 5's and 6's. Obviously a one-page puzzle is not going to be enough for a child who doesn't yet know how to count by 3's or whatever. Another topic, similarly, is time; there are a few sheets in the back of the orange book, but if the child doesn't really get telling time to the hour or half hour the first time around, there's no point in going on to the quarter hours right away.

However, this isn't a complaint! I'm just pointing out why I think it doesn't work as well just to go through the books in a rigid sequence. The curriculum obviously expects that the children are going to be learning skip counting, for instance; and if you look in the

But I guess what I want to say--to make it short--is that as we move into the Red Book, I'm using the topics in the book as a guide to what we should be covering--more addition/subtraction/multiplication, work in fractions, skip counting, doubles, finding tens, inequalities, and eventually division concepts. But I know there's no way she's going to learn those things, like counting by threes, by doing one worksheet. The sheets are there for her to practice on or to nail down something I think she's almost there on; but the bulk of our time will be spent on finding out how numbers work, and the ways we can move them around and do things with them.

We're going to spend the next two weeks doing the T pages of the orange book, which are about measurement. When I looked at the

We are doing some of the C (adding) pages in the Red book, and the focus is grouping for tens. I've noticed that it helps if we start off with a no-book rod activity and then move on to the worksheet. That way too, if Ponytails isn't following the concrete activity, I know it's not time yet to move on to the written part.

Here are a couple of quick ones we've done or are doing with those pages. For C-12, which is 10 + 2, 10 + 4, and so on, I made two piles of rods; one pile was just orange rods, the other was all the other ones. We took turns pulling just one rod out of the mixed pile, but as many oranges in the other hand as we wanted, and "guessing" what number the other person had made. (Guessing is the wrong word, figuring out is probably better.) So I took two orange rods and a red one, and my dd said "10, 20, 22. You have 22." She took four orange rods and a blue one, and I said "49." I tried to make mostly numbers in the teens and twenties to make sure she understood those, but she kept taking as many orange rods as she could to try to make it really hard. I think we got up to 129.

Anyway, after that, the worksheet was no problem.

We're going to do C-15 today, which brings in the concept of grouping for 10s. I think I'll take a group of four or five rods (similar to the groupings on the page) and show her how to add them quickly by building pairs that make ten. I think this follows very well from the C-12 activity--instead of pulling an orange rod, you're pulling two rods that make ten.

Cat and Mouse Game (comments)

Last Friday I planned to have Ponytails do the Red Book, page C-25, the dice game where the cat tries to beat the mouse to the mouse hole. The way it turned out, The Apprentice (seventh grader) had some spare time that morning so I asked her to play the game with her sister instead. I stuck around to watch.

What I quickly realized is that for any child who regularly plays board games, this game is so simple that it quickly becomes boring. (The corresponding subtraction game, D-9, has the same problem.) After one quick round, I suggested that maybe they could spice up the game a bit by designating one or two of the numbers as "go back that many spaces." They decided to make three of the numbers "go forward" and three "go back."

The inevitable happened: with three forward and three back, they ended up going back as much as they went forward! I didn't want to interfere, so I let them play until they'd both been sent back to start several times; then I suggested again that maybe just one of the numbers should be "go back." They decided on 6, and played that way until one of them won.

Just wanted to share about this--that pages like this that may seem too simple can still be made interesting if you add an extra twist!

We are doing 20 minutes of math a day but it's not all from the books; we spend about half the time doing activities with the rods or other manipulatives, practicing skip counting and counting backwards, measuring things and so on. We got through the Orange Book, most of it except for some bits like clock arithmetic, in the first half of the school year, and are now mostly doing the Red Book. At this rate, she will be done it by June, no problem.

Today Ponytails begged me to teach her "the dividing thing, you know, there's a line with a dot on each side." So I did. :-)

Ponytails is almost through the Red book, but we didn't do every page in the books, and we didn't do them in order. What we did do, especially with the Orange book, was use the

I've seen a strong thread of "tens awareness" building through the first two books, even though "place value" as a topic doesn't come up until a later book. If you keep that in mind, Miquon seems to make more sense. You do many activities based around the orange rod--finding combinations of rods that make ten (this covers both adding and subtracting), and learning to group for tens when given a string of numbers to add.

There's also a lot around the concept of equations. You start with very simple equations, like 3 + 3 = 6; later you get into equations where you have to figure something out on each side, like 3 + 3 = 2 + something. (There's a Miquon game called "How much wood" or "Lumberyard" which introduces this concept.) Then inequalities, and greater-and-less-than.

So what I'm saying is that if you do a lot of hands-on activities--using the blackboard, a hundred chart, a number line, the rods, small objects for oral word problems--involving tens and equations, you'll help your child get in touch with some of these basic concepts. Then what you'll find is that the worksheets are kind of like the follow-up activities to the concepts that he's already learning, and you'll find it easier to pick which sheets he should be doing next.

The

Thank you for your questions about this, because it led to a really interesting afternoon reading carefully through that section, and I got some good ideas for number line activities. You mention a problem with Louis’ answer in the Grasshopper game on page 227, and you’re right–it’s a typo where he says the grasshopper goes back 3 jumps and it should say units instead. This game description is almost identical to one in the First Grade Diary, but a few of the numbers were changed, and maybe the word got changed accidentally in the process. (There’s also a typo at the bottom of page 229, top of 230; the section heading and a whole paragraph are repeated.)

About the Number Line topic in general...I hated number line exercises in grade school, and I’ve read that some math educators don’t believe that children understand them. Miquon takes the opposite approach, making them concrete and integral to the program; work on the number lines relates very closely to the work in adding and subtracting, and later, multiplication and fractions. It’s just too bad that they’re hidden in this little section and that the N pages are the ones you’re probably going to skip–what are you supposed to do with a bunch of blank number lines?

The number lines and other activities in this section are interesting because they don’t depend on the usual plus-minus operation signs. For that reason, I think they could be useful and non-threatening for kids who get scared by minus signs. The activities described in the Annotations go from very simple (the basic description of a number line) to quite complex; they should be done throughout the year and the program (there are “N” sheets used in three different workbooks), getting more complex as you go on.

Think of all the different kinds of number lines there are to use. “Real” number lines (on paper or chalkboard) can vary by beginning at points other than 0 or 1, can be marked with fractional units, can be marked in multiples of 2, 3, 5 etc. But there are other number lines that children may find easier to understand: thermometers, rulers, measuring tapes, board games (the kind where you roll the dice and move along a numbered track–there are a couple of simple ones in the workbooks), even life-size number lines drawn with chalk on the driveway. A hundred chart (we have a poster-size one on the wall) is great for a lot of number-line-type activities (Ruth Beechick’s booklet on math gives ideas for using one). We’ve also used concrete things like a tower of blocks to illustrate concepts of increasing and decreasing–going up and down our “skyscraper” in an imaginary elevator, stopping at different floors and sometimes pretending that the elevator goes to several levels of basement (negative numbers).

My take on this topic? I think it’s like many of the other sections, like addition: you start simple, then add little twists in (if the children don’t ask about them themselves), and keep adding on to the possibilities. But slowly, a little at a time, as they’re ready. Talking about functions in primary-level math seems way beyond what most of us expect (we’d like to stick safely with our basic adding and subtracting!). But the interesting part of it...for me...is that playing with numbers in this way is going to incorporate a great amount of adding, subtracting and more, and in a painless way. I also like its practicality as children learn to measure with rulers and apply what they’re learning in one area to the other. And I like its possibilities for bigger questions: where do you end up when you are on the third floor and the elevator goes down five floors? What happens if you want to put two jumping rules together? If we had a number line that went on out the door, where would one million be?

Sheets N2-N4 can be used any way you want; there are suggestions on page 231; you might also look at the problems on page 225.

I like the game presentation of functions here. This is one place where I think the Annotations does do a good job taking you through a series of exercises about number lines and functions, especially at the Green and Yellow levels. It's suggested that you stick to the terminology of the number line games, using words such as: "try my rule," "make up a rule," "2 goes to 4," "start," "beginning number," "land," "landing number," "undoing rules" (inverses), "jail rules," "standstill points," "anywhere goes to anywhere plus four" or "box goes to box plus four." Functions, as far as this book goes, are just more and more complex rules for number line games.

At the Orange level, number lines stay simple, for instance with the basic Gus and Happy game. At the higher levels, the rules of the game become more involved; students experiment with combining more than one rule and with a simple form of graphing the functions (something we spent a lot of time on in high school Functions and Relations).

At one point it's suggested that you try using a number line labelled with letters of the alphabet instead of numbers. You could play that game out loud, too, without written letters: if the rule of the game is to tell me the letter that is my letter plus two more, what is the letter if my letter is B? (That's how substitution ciphers work...also known as secret codes.) This even makes me think of the notes on a piano: if I play C and we make up a rule that says play the note that is two notes lower, you play A. Of course this would only work for adding/subtracting functions, not multiplying/dividing ones.

I wouldn't even worry about the more complex "rules of the game" until your student is very comfortable doing the more basic number line activities. If you notice, there are relatively few worksheets in this section for a topic that can become quite complex; my feeling is (based on the notes) that they originally did a lot of chalkboard work with it. To be honest, I can't even remember going through these upper-level sheets with my oldest daughter, but I know she "did" the Green book. Shows you how much we missed the first time through...

We did K-7 this morning, which is one of two pages dealing with factors of 24 (before the topic of factors is gone into as such). I decided to keep the book closed this time until we had done some concrete work with the rods.

I had Ponytails build a train of 24 (two oranges and a purple) and then asked her to find all the one-colour trains she could of that length. I had intended to wait until she had found them all before doing any recording, but as soon as she lined up six purples, she said "Six fours! Can we write that down?" So we went on like that until she had found three pairs of multiplication facts equalling 24. (After she found twelve twos, I asked her to imagine she had some "twelve rods" and asked how many of those would fit into 24.)

At this point, doing the multiplication part of K-7 would be optional since you have really just done it anyway, but I had Ponytails fill in the blanks anyway. There are division facts (the inverses of the multiplication facts) going down the right hand side of the page, and those are something we're still just getting into, but she didn't have a lot of trouble with them if I phrased it as "how many 4's in 24?"

Oh--and something funny only Miquon users would appreciate. The other day we were in the car and pulled up to a red light beside a sport vehicle. Ponytails pointed: "Look, Mom! Four fours!" I looked, and she was right: on the side, the truck said 4x4.

Ponytails is in her second year now with Miquon and....I find we're using the rods a fair amount, especially for two-digit addition and subtraction,and also a hundred chart. (We made a big one--big is good!-- that has cardboard number disks attached with sticky Velcro.) We use the hundred chart almost every day for oral adding and subtracting problems, and she's getting very good at moving the right number of spaces DOWN for tens and ACROSS for units. (This is great place value stuff.) (Oh, a note about doing hundreds with the rods: we just cut some hundred-sized squares of orange paper.)

We've been playing around with assigning different values to the rods than the usual white = one . This was helpful, for instance, on the "diagnostic page" E-46 which had questions like 60 + 40 + 70 + 30 . I showed Ponytails that if each white rod = 10, she could use the rods easily to add those numbers together (in addition to grouping for tens).

We did E-44 (arranging three given numbers into number sentences) using rods and "symbol cards" (half-pieces of index cards marked with signs for plus, minus, equals etc.). (Haven't done E-45 yet where they are to choose their own three numbers.) After she arranged the rods and cards to make true number sentences, she copied the sentences onto the worksheet.

For E-48 and E-49 I wrote all the questions (10+19, 23-13 etc.) on half-index cards and did them orally using the hundred chart (she did not write the answers). I wrote the addition questions on one side in one colour, and the subtraction ones on the reverse in another colour). This way (since it wasn't done on a worksheet) we can use a few of the same questions as review on another day. Yesterday I picked out three of the addition questions, had her do them with the hundred chart, and then asked her to do the reverse sides as well.

We've also been spending some time on doubles, using pages F-23 and F-25. We started by working down the "1" column on F-25, doing doubles up to 256 (my dd figured that one out with rods). Because she seemed really interested in this, I re-read her a story we have in a Childcraft math book about why there is no mathematical possibility of vampires (because if you double the number of vampires every week, everybody in the world would be a vampire in less than a year :-)); it's just a variation of the story about the servant who asks for one grain of rice, then two, then four etc. until he owns the whole kingdom. I also showed her the doubling function on a calculator (2 x = = = = etc.)

All this is to say that if you have children who are active/easily distracted and who are "global"...I think the word is global...enough to enjoy challenging questions and big numbers even though they may sometimes get stuck on easy ones...I think Miquon continues to be a good choice even past the first grade stage, if you can keep the activities concrete and work within their attention span.

We are in the middle of the green book, having just completed the section on multi-digit addition and now working on number line games.

We also found a game today in

Ponytails is transitioning into the Yellow book, although we haven't finished all the end-of-the-book topics in the Green yet.

Anyway, although Miquon's transition into subtraction is slow, I am really impressed with the reasoning behind it. I told Ponytails that this kind of math--that is, learning to make life easier for yourself by changing questions like 48-13 into 50-15) is "Smart Math." Using-your-brain math, rather than having the teacher tell you what to do and you just doing it. I think she pretty much understood that.

What you're working with here are functions. That's why they're set up as they are...the book is giving you a kind of junior version of math that we did in high school.

The Annotations is really helpful with this section. If you present it as they do, it will probably make more sense. Imagine a series of number line games, where each person involved makes up a different rule for how you're allowed to move. (Kind of like how the different chess pieces all have their own rules for moving. Or each person having their own dance step.) Billy's rule says that you start on "box", and you end up on "box plus three." Whatever "box" is, you add three to "box" to make your move. (In this case, you're jumping by threes then.) You can also say "anywhere" or "starting point" instead of "box" if that makes more sense.

So if you start with 4 and follow "Billy's rule," you end up at ? (7). And so on.

Then "you try Billy's rule." Same thing. Each time you're just adding three.

Then make up some examples of your own.

If you follow the Annotation suggestions, you'll see some variations that you can use while you're playing around with number lines. For instance, what if somebody has a rule that "box" goes to "box plus three", and someone else's rule says "box" goes to "box times two?" If they have a race, who gets further along, or is there a point where one overtakes the other?

Or you could even play "guess my rule." Show a series of moves and see if your child can guess what rule you were following.

LOL, and I thought we were the only ones . We just did those pages, and I couldn't see the point in cutting out the little houses (other than the scissors practice).

But the sections after that have been great--square numbers and area are so much fun with rods! We built pyramids out of rod squares as suggested in the Annotations, but we built them off-center (rather than each new layer right in the middle, we lined up the edges on one corner of the bottom layer, if that makes sense), so that you could see the different colours of rods and how many extra were added. The next day, I printed out some cm graph paper and we did the same thing only with paper and crayons. We made up a story that a famly started out with a small house (a red, 2 cm square) and then needed to enlarge their house, so they added a red rod on each side and then filled in the gap with a white rod, making it as large as a green, 3 cm square. Then they had more children, so they needed to enlarge again, and so on. We went through several squares this way, writing out the formula each time. (i.e. 3 squared = 2 squared + 2 + 2 + 1; 4 squared = 3 squared + 3 + 3 + 1.) There's no way all this would have made any sense to Ponytails (and to me) without the rods.

There are different ways you can illustrate these problem besides with the number line. You could turn each question into a word problem, like this: "If you have two thirds of a pizza, and I have two thirds of a pizza, how many thirds of a pizza do we have? Is there another way to say that? Or, is that more or less than a whole pizza? How much more? It's okay to say we have four thirds of a pizza, and it's also okay to say we have one and a third pizzas."

When you look at each question, try saying it like this "Two two-thirds." "Four two-thirds." "How many two-thirds are there in six-thirds? What IS six-thirds, let's figure that one out first. (Use whatever manipulatives you want.) Oh, six-thirds is the same as two whole things. So how many two-thirds are there in two whole things? (Use manipulatives to figure it out, if you need to.) Do you want to think it through with pizzas again? Well, if you have two-thirds of a pizza, and I have two-thirds, how much do we have left? Another two-thirds. So there are three two-thirds pieces in two whole pizzas."

The last one: "Some number of thirds is the same as two wholes. How many thirds can we fit into two wholes?" (Use manipulatives.)

The manipulatives could include Cuisenaire rods, a paper "Hershey bar" (divided into sections), paper or plastic "pizzas", or plastic fraction pieces.

It's a good idea to vary the shapes if you're doing this kind of exercise on more than one day; you can get into a rut of always thinking about fractions in terms of round things like cakes and pizzas, so it's good to remind kids that fractions come in other shapes like squares and rectangles too. And even, if they're ready to think about this, in groups of things rather than in pieces of a whole. For that, you can use cereal or beans or cubes (white rods work fine) or whatever small objects you want to divide into groups...these kind of problems are definitely more of a mental challenge, but you can turn them into word problems as well. Stories about classes of children, or teams, or a bag of treats that we have to divide up, all work well.

The rods are good fraction manipulatives in themselves, and that's one thing you miss out on if your kids think of them only as representing the numbers one to ten. It can actually be a lot of fun playing around with these ideas...my third grader liked this part of math. For instance, you take a brown rod. "This is two." (You may get protests.) "Well, today it is a two. Maybe it's a two-dollar bill (or coin if you're Canadian). Okay, let's make it be money. If this is a two-dollar bill, show me a one-dollar bill." (Child shows you a purple.) "Show me half a dollar. Show me a quarter dollar." (Short sidetrack into why quarters are called quarters.) "Okay, let's try something else. (Show a light green rod.) This is one. Show me two. Show me three."

The fun, for Ponytails anyway, was when I asked her to do some for me. I think she has caught on to the idea that what we're doing is about relationships. Rods are about relationships. Fractions are about relationships. Fractions are also about dividing and multiplying.

The power of the rods is that they can represent so many different concepts. Any one of the rods can represent "one"; then all the others can be identified in relation to that rod. The most usual set of names we give them is to say that the white rod is one, and then red is two and so on; but that is just the beginning of what you can do with them. If your child works with them from the beginning and understands their relationships, then they should have no trouble in using them for more difficult concepts like fractions. (If the orange rod is two, then the yellow rod is one.)

I'm reading a book called

When I read that chapter, I realized again what a powerful set of ideas we are giving our children with these manipulatives. Primary-aged children, like the Greeks, do not have any knowledge of algebra; we do not ask them yet to "solve for x." But my third grader is able to *see* the answers, using rods, to problems that she would otherwise not be able to solve.

For that reason, I might even suggest that you don't worry about whether the "2" rod is 2 at this point, but stick to the colours and the relationships between the colours. Two reds make a purple, two purples make a brown. How many ways can you make a train as long as an orange rod? You can play trading sorts of games (as if the rods were money)--what will you trade me for a yellow rod? You could even develop that into a sort of playing store--for instance, if a doll is priced at a yellow rod, she could pay for it with five white rods, two reds and a white, etc.

There's a game with variations that's given in the primary-level

The basic game is that you dump about 40-50 rods on the table or the floor, and then take turns trying to find a rod that the other person can't "match." You hold up one of the rods (any rod except a white one), and the other person has to find two rods that make a train as long as your rod. (Not one, or three--just two.) If they can, then you set those three rods aside and the other person gets a turn to hold up a rod and stump you. You continue the game until somebody holds up a rod that can't be matched with the rods that are still on the table; then that person wins the game.

For instance, you hold up an orange rod; the other person can then match it with two yellows, or a purple and a dark green, or a light green and a black, or whatever. But if it's near the end of the game and you hold up a light green (3 cm) rod, and all the red (2 cm) rods have been used up, then there's no way they can match that, and you win.

Lore Rasmussen did use balance scales to demonstrate equations, and somewhere in the teachers' books, can't remember where now, there are suggestions for simple homemade balances that work more-or-less well enough to get the concept across. (For example, margarine tubs suspended from a coat hanger suspended from a broomstick.)

When our oldest was small, we made a balance with yogurt cups, so now whenever we come across an equation that needs to be simplified on both sides, we say "this one is a yogurt-cup problem."

Yes and no--some of the fascination of the rods is in the fact that they can represent anything. If the white is 1,000, the orange is 10,000; if the orange is 1000, the white is 100; if the orange is 100, the white is 10 and so on.

It is convenient for them to learn, though, that for most of the basic arithmetic they'll be doing, the white does represent 1 and the orange 10. One way I taught the relationships between them was to have the child measure all the rods with a white rod. How many white rods fit into a blue, an orange...Also, the stair-patterns and pyramids children often make with the rods are good for showing those relationships--they will remember that first you take a white, then a red, then a light green.

One other way to help them remember might be to connect particular rods with the ages of children in the family. Make up imaginary names for the rods, if people-names don't confuse them in addition to colour-names and number-names. The light green rod is John, he's three; the yellow rod is Joe, he's five; and you're the dark green, six. Jackie is the orange rod, ten--she's twice as big as Joe. Stand them up as if they were little people and have some fun with them. (If John stands on Joe's shoulders, are they as big as Jackie?)

With permission of the list owner, I've dug out some of those posts--mostly for my own benefit, as Crayons is doing the same math now that Ponytails was a few years ago. I've edited them to use our blog nicknames and to take out some repetitive details. I've also added links to things I posted here after we started the blog.

The sequence of the six Miquon Math workbooks is Orange, Red, Blue, Green, Yellow and Purple. The average speed on them for most homeschoolers is about two workbooks a year.

The teacher's manuals for the program are the

*Lab Sheet Annotations*,*Notes to Teachers*, and the*First Grade Diary*. There is no "Lesson 1", "Lesson 2" and so on; each topic is introduced generally in the*Annotations*, and then notes are given for the worksheets. Often there are activities suggested to go along with the sheets, such as chalkboard games. Many Miquon users just have their children work right through the books, especially if they are independent learners; but we had more success mixing up the topics and not depending too heavily on the worksheets.**August 1999: Introducing Myself**This is our fourth year using Miquon and I never imagined there was a loop just for us. I've been reading through the posts and I already see I'm in good company. Our Apprentice just started the yellow book today. She loves the rods, but doing operations with them doesn't make sense to her. She loves the books, likes adding and multiplying (HATES subtracting), but would rather use a hundred chart, break-apart cubes, two rulers one above the other (anybody tried that? it's a "magic adding machine"), turning a question into a word problem, just about anything except putting two rods together and figuring out how long they are.

*Answering a question about using two rulers as an adding machine:*I can't take credit for this idea--I got it from a library book but I can't remember which one! You need two rulers, metric works best because there are more numbers. I use two identical transparent ones. This idea doesn't work well with very young children, but school age children find it fun.

To add 3+12, set the rulers against one another so that the 3 on the upper one is above the 0 on the lower one. Find the 12 on the lower ruler, and whatever number is above the 12 is the answer! To subtract 10-7, place the 10 on the upper ruler over the 7 on the lower one. Find the 0 on the lower ruler, and whatever number is above the 0 is the difference.

**November 1999**We started the Yellow Book this fall and for some reason we just can't get into it; my daughter groans "oh no, Miquon" when I get the book out. We are playing a lot of math games, doing questions with a muffin tin and macaroni (if you put 10 pieces in each compartment, you can do addition and subtraction up to 120) and with coloured cubes and pieces of coloured paper for the units, tens and hundreds (if I give you 5 cubes for the blue tens "column" and 4 for the red units "column", what number do you have? and if I give you 3 more for the blue and 7 for the red?--regrouping is necessary here)....

I never saw anyone as sure yesterday that 48-30 equalled 2 (on D-21). She took away the three tens and then insisted that you had to do something with two (I think she was thinking 10-8). I had to get the muffin tin out and prove the answer was 18, and I still don't think she believed me.

**December 1999**I read a very interesting article by Ruth Beechick (I think it was in her

*Question and Answer Book*). To summarize...She describes a class where the children solved problems with some kind of flat counters. The teacher would say "make three piles of two" or "eight piles of ten" and so on. The kids got comfortable with the idea of not counting every single one. As I remember it, she eventually suggested to some of them that they could write out the solutions so that they wouldn't have to count out all those piles every time; she showed them how they could take two piles of two, three piles of two, four piles of two etc. and write the answers going across the page; and then they caught on and started writing out the threes, fours etc. The idea spread around the classroom and soon many of the kids were writing out their own tables for reference.Later she suggested that if they learned some of those facts they wouldn't have to refer to the tables all the time, and again the idea caught on; the kids saw the usefulness of carrying the facts around in their heads instead of on their papers. I don't know how well they all learned their times tables, but I'm sure that was a happier classroom than the one in "Hans Christian Andersen!" (If you never saw the movie, the schoolchildren are droning "two and two are four, four and four are eight...")

**December 1999 again**In spite of my complaints [about the Yellow book], we have found one way to make some of the addition and subtraction a little clearer (for example, page E-53, which is addition and subtraction with a sum or difference of 100, 200, 1000, etc.) We get out our pile of pennies, dimes and Canadian dollar coins, and do the problems as if they were money.

We have a couple of favourite scenarios we use with this. One is "you had this much money in your piggy bank this morning. Your sister came along and "borrowed" a few coins. When you came back later, you found you only had so much money left. How much exactly did she take?"

The opposite is, "you had this much money; grandpa came for a visit and slipped a few coins in; when you counted all your money you found you had this much; so how much money did he put in?"

One problem was x + 32 = 100. My dd didn't know how to do this mentally, so I said, "Pretend I'm 30 years old. In how many years will I be 100?" "70," she said. "Now it's two years later; I'm 32 years old. Now how many years will it be until I'm 100?" "About 72" she said. "Really? But two years ago you told me it would only be 70 years. How can it be more now?" She thought about this, and then decided 68 made more sense.

*[There is a long gap here because The Apprentice switched to another math program, and I unsubscribed from the Miquon-Key list until our second daughter, Ponytails, was in the first grade and starting Miquon.]***August 2003**I'm starting Miquon again with renewed enthusiasm for the program, and I'm trying to use it more creatively. One difference from our first time through is that Ponytails is a bit older than The Apprentice was when she started the workbooks.

Another difference this time around is that Ponytails has had lots of experience playing with rods over the last couple of years. She's not quite comfortable yet thinking of them in terms of their actual length; she thinks of them as a blue rod or a green rod, not as a four or a five; but I think actually that's good; it means she can think about them for themselves without worrying too much yet what they represent.

**September 2003**I inadvertently found a way to heighten Ponytails' interest in learning the lengths of Cuisenaire rods. This morning I held up a yellow rod and asked her how many white rods long it would be. She said four. I said "Okay--prove it." She took the bait and said, "Okay then--I WILL." She lined up the white rods and admitted that she needed five. When I held up a light green and asked how many whites that would take, she said, "Three--and I'll PROVE it to you." And she did. We continued like that, and she kept on PROVING stuff to me--and the math got done.

**September 2003**I found a homemade substitute for the wooden rod tubes described in the

*First Grade Diary*(wooden tubes just long enough to hold one 10 cm orange rod, or the equivalent in shorter rods). (They are described in the entry for Sept. 30.)Cut a piece of index card to a 10 cm length and wrap it fairly tightly around an orange rod, trying to crease the edges as you go (to keep the rectangular shape). Secure each end well with tape, and there you go. I made four in under 10 minutes. They're obviously not made to last forever, but at that price they could be replaced easily when needed.

The purpose of the tubes, if you don't have the

*Diary*, is to play hidden-rod sorts of games. The simplest version would be to insert two rods that add up to ten, show the child one end of the tube, and ask what colour should appear at the other end. A more complicated version would be to use three (or more) rods, show both ends and ask what is hidden in the middle.**September 2003: Centimeter Cubes**We use these for a lot of things (besides giving the toddler something to play with

*[update: I don't remember what our toddler was doing playing with something so small--I must have been right beside her at the time because obviously cm cubes aren't an appropriate toy for children small enough to eat them]*); I used them a lot when my oldest was learning subtraction, because you can't break a piece off a Cuisenaire rod! We also used them later on to demonstrate multiplication/division--twenty cubes snapped together, then broken into four groups of five and so on.Young children can use them to do patterns with--two reds, a blue, two reds, a blue. You can draw a pattern with markers and have them copy it.

You can build things with them besides just straight trains. Build a 3-D model for the child to copy, something made out of several cubes stuck together. (Easy to do with Duplo or Lego too.)

You can use them to visualize word problems; for instance, you can use a piece of green construction paper to represent a field, and use some white cubes to represent sheep in the field--for counting, adding, subtracting. Or a blue piece with different coloured "fish".

We also use them to play a simple guessing game at about the K-1 level. You snap a few together (5 or 6), hold it behind your back and break a couple off; hold out the remaining piece and have the child guess how many are still behind your back. (You can do the break-off game with Duplo or Lego blocks too. Anything that snaps. Or even with small groups of non-joining objects, such as crayons or coins.)

And I suppose you could use them for actually measuring things

**October 2003: After A Month of Grade One**

....I have to say, I am more impressed than ever with Miquon and I'm glad I chose it for my first grader (I might have been discouraged after my older one's so-so experience).

The amazing part of this that we are doing a maximum of 20 minutes of math a day, doing a lot of rod games and the sorts of short activities suggested in First Grade Diary, and Ponytails is NEVERTHELESS picking up not only addition concepts but has started subtraction as well and ENJOYS it.

What a great program this is. I keep wondering why I see all these entire unused sets of Miquon at used curriculum sales; it makes me wonder if people just give up too soon.

**October 2003**

On the difficulty of problems such as x - 3 = 2:

Ponytails and I played around with some problems like this today using coloured popsicle sticks and a small empty box which had originally contained frozen chicken wings. I put six popsicle sticks in the box without showing her how many, and said "I was all by myself for dinner and I was hungry, so I took out four chicken wings to cook. (I removed four sticks.) The next time I looked in the box (I showed her), there were two left. How many were there before I ate all those chicken wings?" She looked at the two in the box and the four on the table and said "six." We repeated this with some different sets of numbers, and she had no trouble with that.

Then we went to our blackboard and I drew an empty square and told her that was for "something." I wrote the problem "Something" - 4 = 2, and reminded her about the "chicken wings." I also showed her again with the appropriate Cuisenaire rods. She caught on to that quickly. I did one more simple one with her, and then she wanted to write one. She wrote "Something" - 5 = 10. I asked her, "Do you know how to do that one?" She wasn't sure. I took a yellow and an orange rod and said, "here's our 5, and here's our 10." She still wasn't sure how much that would be, so I had her figure out how long they would be together in white rods, and she got it.

**October 2003: Odd and Even**

I notice in the

*First Grade Diary*that the topic of odd and even is suddenly introduced at about this point in the school year, although there's no comment there about how it was first presented (there are some suggestions in the Annotations, though), and odd-and-even worksheets aren't included until the Red Book.

I asked Ponytails if she knew what odd and even numbers were, and she said, "One is odd. Two is even. Three is odd. Four is even, and like that." I asked her if she knew how you know if something is an odd number, and she gave me a pretty hilarious explanation that I can't even try to reproduce here. (Some of our adult explanations must sound just like that to her.)

So obviously she does have some idea that some numbers are odd or even, but doesn't really understand what that means.....One explanation given in the Miquon materials was that you can build an even number with red rods, but an odd number you can't. I also saw an arrangement of cubes (similar to an activity in

*Family Math*) where you take one cube, two cubes, three cubes etc. and show how you can arrange the even ones in pairs but not the odd ones.

**January 2004**

I've noticed that some topics are covered VERY briefly in the Miquon worksheets, for instance, skip counting. In the Red Book, page F-15 is a dot to dot based on counting by 3's; F-18 is counting by 4's; F-21 is counting by 5's and 6's. Obviously a one-page puzzle is not going to be enough for a child who doesn't yet know how to count by 3's or whatever. Another topic, similarly, is time; there are a few sheets in the back of the orange book, but if the child doesn't really get telling time to the hour or half hour the first time around, there's no point in going on to the quarter hours right away.

However, this isn't a complaint! I'm just pointing out why I think it doesn't work as well just to go through the books in a rigid sequence. The curriculum obviously expects that the children are going to be learning skip counting, for instance; and if you look in the

*Annotations*and

*First Grade Diary*, there are extra suggestions for activities for the different topics. If I see pages on a topic I think Ponytails has already mastered (like the simple counting dot-to-dots at the beginning of the Orange Book), I use those sheets to see for sure that she knows what she's doing and has no difficulty.

But I guess what I want to say--to make it short--is that as we move into the Red Book, I'm using the topics in the book as a guide to what we should be covering--more addition/subtraction/multiplication, work in fractions, skip counting, doubles, finding tens, inequalities, and eventually division concepts. But I know there's no way she's going to learn those things, like counting by threes, by doing one worksheet. The sheets are there for her to practice on or to nail down something I think she's almost there on; but the bulk of our time will be spent on finding out how numbers work, and the ways we can move them around and do things with them.

**February 2004: A Measurement Story**

We're going to spend the next two weeks doing the T pages of the orange book, which are about measurement. When I looked at the

*Labsheet Annotations*for this section, there were some classroom experiences described that sounded a bit difficult to replicate with just one student, so I took the description and rewrote it as a story for my daughter. (She always likes to hear what "the Miquon teacher" did with her class according to the

*First Grade Diary*.)

**February 2004**

We are doing some of the C (adding) pages in the Red book, and the focus is grouping for tens. I've noticed that it helps if we start off with a no-book rod activity and then move on to the worksheet. That way too, if Ponytails isn't following the concrete activity, I know it's not time yet to move on to the written part.

Here are a couple of quick ones we've done or are doing with those pages. For C-12, which is 10 + 2, 10 + 4, and so on, I made two piles of rods; one pile was just orange rods, the other was all the other ones. We took turns pulling just one rod out of the mixed pile, but as many oranges in the other hand as we wanted, and "guessing" what number the other person had made. (Guessing is the wrong word, figuring out is probably better.) So I took two orange rods and a red one, and my dd said "10, 20, 22. You have 22." She took four orange rods and a blue one, and I said "49." I tried to make mostly numbers in the teens and twenties to make sure she understood those, but she kept taking as many orange rods as she could to try to make it really hard. I think we got up to 129.

Anyway, after that, the worksheet was no problem.

We're going to do C-15 today, which brings in the concept of grouping for 10s. I think I'll take a group of four or five rods (similar to the groupings on the page) and show her how to add them quickly by building pairs that make ten. I think this follows very well from the C-12 activity--instead of pulling an orange rod, you're pulling two rods that make ten.

**March 2004**

Cat and Mouse Game (comments)

Last Friday I planned to have Ponytails do the Red Book, page C-25, the dice game where the cat tries to beat the mouse to the mouse hole. The way it turned out, The Apprentice (seventh grader) had some spare time that morning so I asked her to play the game with her sister instead. I stuck around to watch.

What I quickly realized is that for any child who regularly plays board games, this game is so simple that it quickly becomes boring. (The corresponding subtraction game, D-9, has the same problem.) After one quick round, I suggested that maybe they could spice up the game a bit by designating one or two of the numbers as "go back that many spaces." They decided to make three of the numbers "go forward" and three "go back."

The inevitable happened: with three forward and three back, they ended up going back as much as they went forward! I didn't want to interfere, so I let them play until they'd both been sent back to start several times; then I suggested again that maybe just one of the numbers should be "go back." They decided on 6, and played that way until one of them won.

Just wanted to share about this--that pages like this that may seem too simple can still be made interesting if you add an extra twist!

**March 2004**

We are doing 20 minutes of math a day but it's not all from the books; we spend about half the time doing activities with the rods or other manipulatives, practicing skip counting and counting backwards, measuring things and so on. We got through the Orange Book, most of it except for some bits like clock arithmetic, in the first half of the school year, and are now mostly doing the Red Book. At this rate, she will be done it by June, no problem.

Today Ponytails begged me to teach her "the dividing thing, you know, there's a line with a dot on each side." So I did. :-)

**May 2004**

Ponytails is almost through the Red book, but we didn't do every page in the books, and we didn't do them in order. What we did do, especially with the Orange book, was use the

*First Grade Diary*as a model. Not exactly every day as described (that would be impossible), but as kind of a plan for what typical math lessons would look like--often incorporating two or three seemingly unrelated activities, and having only one of those (at the most) be a worksheet. We did pages from the Red book (such as the Odd/Even section) before finishing the Orange book. We've worked on concepts like telling time and geometry all through the year, not just for the few pages on that that are included in the Orange book.

I've seen a strong thread of "tens awareness" building through the first two books, even though "place value" as a topic doesn't come up until a later book. If you keep that in mind, Miquon seems to make more sense. You do many activities based around the orange rod--finding combinations of rods that make ten (this covers both adding and subtracting), and learning to group for tens when given a string of numbers to add.

There's also a lot around the concept of equations. You start with very simple equations, like 3 + 3 = 6; later you get into equations where you have to figure something out on each side, like 3 + 3 = 2 + something. (There's a Miquon game called "How much wood" or "Lumberyard" which introduces this concept.) Then inequalities, and greater-and-less-than.

So what I'm saying is that if you do a lot of hands-on activities--using the blackboard, a hundred chart, a number line, the rods, small objects for oral word problems--involving tens and equations, you'll help your child get in touch with some of these basic concepts. Then what you'll find is that the worksheets are kind of like the follow-up activities to the concepts that he's already learning, and you'll find it easier to pick which sheets he should be doing next.

**May 2004: Numberlines**

The

*Lab Sheet Annotations*is not the best laid-out teacher’s manual....I’ve added “improvements” to my copy, including colour-coded notes at the top of the pages to show which of them relate to which workbook. It does leave a lot up to the teacher to decide. I originally had the impression that Miquon students visited the math lab and were just turned loose with balances and blocks. I think that was partly true (according to the manuals), but there was also a sense of progression and growth in understanding that could only come through a certain amount of planning and guidance by the teacher.

*I responded to questions by a list member about Section N.*

Thank you for your questions about this, because it led to a really interesting afternoon reading carefully through that section, and I got some good ideas for number line activities. You mention a problem with Louis’ answer in the Grasshopper game on page 227, and you’re right–it’s a typo where he says the grasshopper goes back 3 jumps and it should say units instead. This game description is almost identical to one in the First Grade Diary, but a few of the numbers were changed, and maybe the word got changed accidentally in the process. (There’s also a typo at the bottom of page 229, top of 230; the section heading and a whole paragraph are repeated.)

About the Number Line topic in general...I hated number line exercises in grade school, and I’ve read that some math educators don’t believe that children understand them. Miquon takes the opposite approach, making them concrete and integral to the program; work on the number lines relates very closely to the work in adding and subtracting, and later, multiplication and fractions. It’s just too bad that they’re hidden in this little section and that the N pages are the ones you’re probably going to skip–what are you supposed to do with a bunch of blank number lines?

The number lines and other activities in this section are interesting because they don’t depend on the usual plus-minus operation signs. For that reason, I think they could be useful and non-threatening for kids who get scared by minus signs. The activities described in the Annotations go from very simple (the basic description of a number line) to quite complex; they should be done throughout the year and the program (there are “N” sheets used in three different workbooks), getting more complex as you go on.

Think of all the different kinds of number lines there are to use. “Real” number lines (on paper or chalkboard) can vary by beginning at points other than 0 or 1, can be marked with fractional units, can be marked in multiples of 2, 3, 5 etc. But there are other number lines that children may find easier to understand: thermometers, rulers, measuring tapes, board games (the kind where you roll the dice and move along a numbered track–there are a couple of simple ones in the workbooks), even life-size number lines drawn with chalk on the driveway. A hundred chart (we have a poster-size one on the wall) is great for a lot of number-line-type activities (Ruth Beechick’s booklet on math gives ideas for using one). We’ve also used concrete things like a tower of blocks to illustrate concepts of increasing and decreasing–going up and down our “skyscraper” in an imaginary elevator, stopping at different floors and sometimes pretending that the elevator goes to several levels of basement (negative numbers).

My take on this topic? I think it’s like many of the other sections, like addition: you start simple, then add little twists in (if the children don’t ask about them themselves), and keep adding on to the possibilities. But slowly, a little at a time, as they’re ready. Talking about functions in primary-level math seems way beyond what most of us expect (we’d like to stick safely with our basic adding and subtracting!). But the interesting part of it...for me...is that playing with numbers in this way is going to incorporate a great amount of adding, subtracting and more, and in a painless way. I also like its practicality as children learn to measure with rulers and apply what they’re learning in one area to the other. And I like its possibilities for bigger questions: where do you end up when you are on the third floor and the elevator goes down five floors? What happens if you want to put two jumping rules together? If we had a number line that went on out the door, where would one million be?

**May 2004 again**

*A list member wrote, "Regarding the Functions section, I'm not even sure I would know how to approach or explain this. Any suggestion would be so helpful."*

Sheets N2-N4 can be used any way you want; there are suggestions on page 231; you might also look at the problems on page 225.

I like the game presentation of functions here. This is one place where I think the Annotations does do a good job taking you through a series of exercises about number lines and functions, especially at the Green and Yellow levels. It's suggested that you stick to the terminology of the number line games, using words such as: "try my rule," "make up a rule," "2 goes to 4," "start," "beginning number," "land," "landing number," "undoing rules" (inverses), "jail rules," "standstill points," "anywhere goes to anywhere plus four" or "box goes to box plus four." Functions, as far as this book goes, are just more and more complex rules for number line games.

At the Orange level, number lines stay simple, for instance with the basic Gus and Happy game. At the higher levels, the rules of the game become more involved; students experiment with combining more than one rule and with a simple form of graphing the functions (something we spent a lot of time on in high school Functions and Relations).

At one point it's suggested that you try using a number line labelled with letters of the alphabet instead of numbers. You could play that game out loud, too, without written letters: if the rule of the game is to tell me the letter that is my letter plus two more, what is the letter if my letter is B? (That's how substitution ciphers work...also known as secret codes.) This even makes me think of the notes on a piano: if I play C and we make up a rule that says play the note that is two notes lower, you play A. Of course this would only work for adding/subtracting functions, not multiplying/dividing ones.

I wouldn't even worry about the more complex "rules of the game" until your student is very comfortable doing the more basic number line activities. If you notice, there are relatively few worksheets in this section for a topic that can become quite complex; my feeling is (based on the notes) that they originally did a lot of chalkboard work with it. To be honest, I can't even remember going through these upper-level sheets with my oldest daughter, but I know she "did" the Green book. Shows you how much we missed the first time through...

**June 2004**

We did K-7 this morning, which is one of two pages dealing with factors of 24 (before the topic of factors is gone into as such). I decided to keep the book closed this time until we had done some concrete work with the rods.

I had Ponytails build a train of 24 (two oranges and a purple) and then asked her to find all the one-colour trains she could of that length. I had intended to wait until she had found them all before doing any recording, but as soon as she lined up six purples, she said "Six fours! Can we write that down?" So we went on like that until she had found three pairs of multiplication facts equalling 24. (After she found twelve twos, I asked her to imagine she had some "twelve rods" and asked how many of those would fit into 24.)

At this point, doing the multiplication part of K-7 would be optional since you have really just done it anyway, but I had Ponytails fill in the blanks anyway. There are division facts (the inverses of the multiplication facts) going down the right hand side of the page, and those are something we're still just getting into, but she didn't have a lot of trouble with them if I phrased it as "how many 4's in 24?"

Oh--and something funny only Miquon users would appreciate. The other day we were in the car and pulled up to a red light beside a sport vehicle. Ponytails pointed: "Look, Mom! Four fours!" I looked, and she was right: on the side, the truck said 4x4.

**November 2004: Blue Book**

Ponytails is in her second year now with Miquon and....I find we're using the rods a fair amount, especially for two-digit addition and subtraction,and also a hundred chart. (We made a big one--big is good!-- that has cardboard number disks attached with sticky Velcro.) We use the hundred chart almost every day for oral adding and subtracting problems, and she's getting very good at moving the right number of spaces DOWN for tens and ACROSS for units. (This is great place value stuff.) (Oh, a note about doing hundreds with the rods: we just cut some hundred-sized squares of orange paper.)

We've been playing around with assigning different values to the rods than the usual white = one . This was helpful, for instance, on the "diagnostic page" E-46 which had questions like 60 + 40 + 70 + 30 . I showed Ponytails that if each white rod = 10, she could use the rods easily to add those numbers together (in addition to grouping for tens).

We did E-44 (arranging three given numbers into number sentences) using rods and "symbol cards" (half-pieces of index cards marked with signs for plus, minus, equals etc.). (Haven't done E-45 yet where they are to choose their own three numbers.) After she arranged the rods and cards to make true number sentences, she copied the sentences onto the worksheet.

For E-48 and E-49 I wrote all the questions (10+19, 23-13 etc.) on half-index cards and did them orally using the hundred chart (she did not write the answers). I wrote the addition questions on one side in one colour, and the subtraction ones on the reverse in another colour). This way (since it wasn't done on a worksheet) we can use a few of the same questions as review on another day. Yesterday I picked out three of the addition questions, had her do them with the hundred chart, and then asked her to do the reverse sides as well.

We've also been spending some time on doubles, using pages F-23 and F-25. We started by working down the "1" column on F-25, doing doubles up to 256 (my dd figured that one out with rods). Because she seemed really interested in this, I re-read her a story we have in a Childcraft math book about why there is no mathematical possibility of vampires (because if you double the number of vampires every week, everybody in the world would be a vampire in less than a year :-)); it's just a variation of the story about the servant who asks for one grain of rice, then two, then four etc. until he owns the whole kingdom. I also showed her the doubling function on a calculator (2 x = = = = etc.)

All this is to say that if you have children who are active/easily distracted and who are "global"...I think the word is global...enough to enjoy challenging questions and big numbers even though they may sometimes get stuck on easy ones...I think Miquon continues to be a good choice even past the first grade stage, if you can keep the activities concrete and work within their attention span.

**April 2005: Number Lines**

We are in the middle of the green book, having just completed the section on multi-digit addition and now working on number line games.

We also found a game today in

*Family Math*that is good for place value and addition. If you have the book, it's called Dollar Digit and it's on page 112. You need a pile of dimes and a pile of pennies; one die; and two sheets of paper each marked in two columns (one for dimes, one for pennies). You number each paper 1-7 down the left hand side. For each turn, someone rolls the die but all the players use that same number. You can either take that number of pennies or that number of dimes (but not mixed), and place them beside the number 1 on your sheet. Next turn, someone else rolls but all players again use the number from that roll. Any time you get 10 pennies, you have to trade them for a dime. After 7 rolls, you add up what you have, and the closest one to a dollar wins. (You can make a rule that you can't go over, if you want.)

**May 2005**

Ponytails is transitioning into the Yellow book, although we haven't finished all the end-of-the-book topics in the Green yet.

Anyway, although Miquon's transition into subtraction is slow, I am really impressed with the reasoning behind it. I told Ponytails that this kind of math--that is, learning to make life easier for yourself by changing questions like 48-13 into 50-15) is "Smart Math." Using-your-brain math, rather than having the teacher tell you what to do and you just doing it. I think she pretty much understood that.

**May 2005: Functions**

*A list member asked about Page N-7: "Why is it written 'box arrow box' then the rule to add or subtract a number. Why not just one box?"*

What you're working with here are functions. That's why they're set up as they are...the book is giving you a kind of junior version of math that we did in high school.

The Annotations is really helpful with this section. If you present it as they do, it will probably make more sense. Imagine a series of number line games, where each person involved makes up a different rule for how you're allowed to move. (Kind of like how the different chess pieces all have their own rules for moving. Or each person having their own dance step.) Billy's rule says that you start on "box", and you end up on "box plus three." Whatever "box" is, you add three to "box" to make your move. (In this case, you're jumping by threes then.) You can also say "anywhere" or "starting point" instead of "box" if that makes more sense.

So if you start with 4 and follow "Billy's rule," you end up at ? (7). And so on.

Then "you try Billy's rule." Same thing. Each time you're just adding three.

Then make up some examples of your own.

If you follow the Annotation suggestions, you'll see some variations that you can use while you're playing around with number lines. For instance, what if somebody has a rule that "box" goes to "box plus three", and someone else's rule says "box" goes to "box times two?" If they have a race, who gets further along, or is there a point where one overtakes the other?

Or you could even play "guess my rule." Show a series of moves and see if your child can guess what rule you were following.

**May 2005 again**

*A list member mentioned that they always skipped the Factor House Game in the O pages.*

LOL, and I thought we were the only ones . We just did those pages, and I couldn't see the point in cutting out the little houses (other than the scissors practice).

But the sections after that have been great--square numbers and area are so much fun with rods! We built pyramids out of rod squares as suggested in the Annotations, but we built them off-center (rather than each new layer right in the middle, we lined up the edges on one corner of the bottom layer, if that makes sense), so that you could see the different colours of rods and how many extra were added. The next day, I printed out some cm graph paper and we did the same thing only with paper and crayons. We made up a story that a famly started out with a small house (a red, 2 cm square) and then needed to enlarge their house, so they added a red rod on each side and then filled in the gap with a white rod, making it as large as a green, 3 cm square. Then they had more children, so they needed to enlarge again, and so on. We went through several squares this way, writing out the formula each time. (i.e. 3 squared = 2 squared + 2 + 2 + 1; 4 squared = 3 squared + 3 + 3 + 1.) There's no way all this would have made any sense to Ponytails (and to me) without the rods.

**December 2005**

*A list member asked for help with worksheet H-47.*

There are different ways you can illustrate these problem besides with the number line. You could turn each question into a word problem, like this: "If you have two thirds of a pizza, and I have two thirds of a pizza, how many thirds of a pizza do we have? Is there another way to say that? Or, is that more or less than a whole pizza? How much more? It's okay to say we have four thirds of a pizza, and it's also okay to say we have one and a third pizzas."

When you look at each question, try saying it like this "Two two-thirds." "Four two-thirds." "How many two-thirds are there in six-thirds? What IS six-thirds, let's figure that one out first. (Use whatever manipulatives you want.) Oh, six-thirds is the same as two whole things. So how many two-thirds are there in two whole things? (Use manipulatives to figure it out, if you need to.) Do you want to think it through with pizzas again? Well, if you have two-thirds of a pizza, and I have two-thirds, how much do we have left? Another two-thirds. So there are three two-thirds pieces in two whole pizzas."

The last one: "Some number of thirds is the same as two wholes. How many thirds can we fit into two wholes?" (Use manipulatives.)

The manipulatives could include Cuisenaire rods, a paper "Hershey bar" (divided into sections), paper or plastic "pizzas", or plastic fraction pieces.

It's a good idea to vary the shapes if you're doing this kind of exercise on more than one day; you can get into a rut of always thinking about fractions in terms of round things like cakes and pizzas, so it's good to remind kids that fractions come in other shapes like squares and rectangles too. And even, if they're ready to think about this, in groups of things rather than in pieces of a whole. For that, you can use cereal or beans or cubes (white rods work fine) or whatever small objects you want to divide into groups...these kind of problems are definitely more of a mental challenge, but you can turn them into word problems as well. Stories about classes of children, or teams, or a bag of treats that we have to divide up, all work well.

The rods are good fraction manipulatives in themselves, and that's one thing you miss out on if your kids think of them only as representing the numbers one to ten. It can actually be a lot of fun playing around with these ideas...my third grader liked this part of math. For instance, you take a brown rod. "This is two." (You may get protests.) "Well, today it is a two. Maybe it's a two-dollar bill (or coin if you're Canadian). Okay, let's make it be money. If this is a two-dollar bill, show me a one-dollar bill." (Child shows you a purple.) "Show me half a dollar. Show me a quarter dollar." (Short sidetrack into why quarters are called quarters.) "Okay, let's try something else. (Show a light green rod.) This is one. Show me two. Show me three."

The fun, for Ponytails anyway, was when I asked her to do some for me. I think she has caught on to the idea that what we're doing is about relationships. Rods are about relationships. Fractions are about relationships. Fractions are also about dividing and multiplying.

**March 30, 2006**

The power of the rods is that they can represent so many different concepts. Any one of the rods can represent "one"; then all the others can be identified in relation to that rod. The most usual set of names we give them is to say that the white rod is one, and then red is two and so on; but that is just the beginning of what you can do with them. If your child works with them from the beginning and understands their relationships, then they should have no trouble in using them for more difficult concepts like fractions. (If the orange rod is two, then the yellow rod is one.)

I'm reading a book called

*The Mathematical Mystery Tour*, written for adults--kind of a fictionalized history of mathematics. It got mixed reviews on Amazon as far as its scope and attention to details goes (and whether it was boring or not). The point, though, is that in the first chapter the characters are talking about Pythagoras and early Greek mathematics, which was based only on integers. The mathematician in the chapter points out that the ancient Greeks substituted their geometrical knowledge for the algebra they lacked. In other words, they could draw a diagram of a problem (in the dirt, usually) and figure out how to express the answer as a ratio (since they had only integers to work with). The diagrams in the book look exactly like something you might build with Cuisenaire rods!

When I read that chapter, I realized again what a powerful set of ideas we are giving our children with these manipulatives. Primary-aged children, like the Greeks, do not have any knowledge of algebra; we do not ask them yet to "solve for x." But my third grader is able to *see* the answers, using rods, to problems that she would otherwise not be able to solve.

**April 2006: Cookin' with Math**

**May 2006: Math Stuff**

**January 2007: Trains Game**

*A list member asked about number names for rods.*

For that reason, I might even suggest that you don't worry about whether the "2" rod is 2 at this point, but stick to the colours and the relationships between the colours. Two reds make a purple, two purples make a brown. How many ways can you make a train as long as an orange rod? You can play trading sorts of games (as if the rods were money)--what will you trade me for a yellow rod? You could even develop that into a sort of playing store--for instance, if a doll is priced at a yellow rod, she could pay for it with five white rods, two reds and a white, etc.

There's a game with variations that's given in the primary-level

*Idea Book for Cuisenaire Rods*, and we've played it many times to help build awareness of the colours without getting hung up on the numbers.

The basic game is that you dump about 40-50 rods on the table or the floor, and then take turns trying to find a rod that the other person can't "match." You hold up one of the rods (any rod except a white one), and the other person has to find two rods that make a train as long as your rod. (Not one, or three--just two.) If they can, then you set those three rods aside and the other person gets a turn to hold up a rod and stump you. You continue the game until somebody holds up a rod that can't be matched with the rods that are still on the table; then that person wins the game.

For instance, you hold up an orange rod; the other person can then match it with two yellows, or a purple and a dark green, or a light green and a black, or whatever. But if it's near the end of the game and you hold up a light green (3 cm) rod, and all the red (2 cm) rods have been used up, then there's no way they can match that, and you win.

**April 2007: Yay for Cuisenaire Rods**

**June 2007: The Second First Year of Miquon Math****August 2007: Math with Lore**

**September 2007: More Math Lore**

**December 2007: On Using Balances**

Lore Rasmussen did use balance scales to demonstrate equations, and somewhere in the teachers' books, can't remember where now, there are suggestions for simple homemade balances that work more-or-less well enough to get the concept across. (For example, margarine tubs suspended from a coat hanger suspended from a broomstick.)

When our oldest was small, we made a balance with yogurt cups, so now whenever we come across an equation that needs to be simplified on both sides, we say "this one is a yogurt-cup problem."

**May 2008: Names of Blocks**

*Another question about memorizing the colours and number names of Cuisenaire rods.*

Yes and no--some of the fascination of the rods is in the fact that they can represent anything. If the white is 1,000, the orange is 10,000; if the orange is 1000, the white is 100; if the orange is 100, the white is 10 and so on.

It is convenient for them to learn, though, that for most of the basic arithmetic they'll be doing, the white does represent 1 and the orange 10. One way I taught the relationships between them was to have the child measure all the rods with a white rod. How many white rods fit into a blue, an orange...Also, the stair-patterns and pyramids children often make with the rods are good for showing those relationships--they will remember that first you take a white, then a red, then a light green.

One other way to help them remember might be to connect particular rods with the ages of children in the family. Make up imaginary names for the rods, if people-names don't confuse them in addition to colour-names and number-names. The light green rod is John, he's three; the yellow rod is Joe, he's five; and you're the dark green, six. Jackie is the orange rod, ten--she's twice as big as Joe. Stand them up as if they were little people and have some fun with them. (If John stands on Joe's shoulders, are they as big as Jackie?)

**July 2008: Crayons' Grade Two: Math (planning process and detailed Blue Book notes)**

**October 2008: How's School Going?**

Labels:
Homeschooling,
hundred chart,
Lore Rasmussen,
Math,
Miquon Math

## Monday, February 23, 2009

### Every non-existent package has a Silver lining

Last week I got a "final notice" from the post office that I had an undelivered package waiting at the convenience store (not convenient, it's a special car trip) where they send these things. I had picked up a package there a couple of weeks ago and wasn't expecting anything else, so I phoned the store just to make sure they weren't still talking about that package; the lady at the mail counter checked her computer and said yes, there was something there.

So, who knows, my birthday is soon. Okay. After Crayons' dancing Saturday morning, four Squirrels (hungry for lunch) drove down to the small plaza where the inconvenience store/postal outlet is located.

Big surprise, or maybe not: there wasn't anything on the shelf. They just forgot to clear the first package. Well, at least I didn't have to stand in line this time to find that out.

Anyway, when we were there a couple of weeks ago, we noticed that a Christian mission runs a thrift shop in the same plaza. Last time we were there, it had just closed for the day (they close early on Saturdays). This time we were lucky and we decided to ignore the hunger pangs a bit longer and check it out quickly.

In a few minutes, we had acquired:

2 retro record albums for Mr. Fixit

1 very pretty Barbie and 2 Ty Teenie Beanie dolls for Crayons (her own money)

3 Walter Wangerin Jr. books:

I think the total for everything was about $6.

We looked up the Teenie Beanie dolls online when we got home; they are one of Crayons' current interests, especially because you can find them used for very little money. Rugged Rusty still had his ID label, but we had to hunt a bit to identify Pretty Penny, because she was missing her hat and sweater. We fixed her up, though; she now has a Squirrel-crocheted sweater and hat. [Picture to come.]

So, who knows, my birthday is soon. Okay. After Crayons' dancing Saturday morning, four Squirrels (hungry for lunch) drove down to the small plaza where the inconvenience store/postal outlet is located.

Big surprise, or maybe not: there wasn't anything on the shelf. They just forgot to clear the first package. Well, at least I didn't have to stand in line this time to find that out.

Anyway, when we were there a couple of weeks ago, we noticed that a Christian mission runs a thrift shop in the same plaza. Last time we were there, it had just closed for the day (they close early on Saturdays). This time we were lucky and we decided to ignore the hunger pangs a bit longer and check it out quickly.

In a few minutes, we had acquired:

2 retro record albums for Mr. Fixit

1 very pretty Barbie and 2 Ty Teenie Beanie dolls for Crayons (her own money)

*Silver for General Washington*, by Enid LaMonte Meadowcroft, for 25 cents (vintage Scholastic, 1974 printing)*Outcast*, by Rosemary Sutcliff, nice hardcover3 Walter Wangerin Jr. books:

*The Book of Sorrows*(25 cents),*Miz Lil & the Chronicles of Grace*(75 cents),*As For Me And My House*(a dollar). All from the same church library.I think the total for everything was about $6.

We looked up the Teenie Beanie dolls online when we got home; they are one of Crayons' current interests, especially because you can find them used for very little money. Rugged Rusty still had his ID label, but we had to hunt a bit to identify Pretty Penny, because she was missing her hat and sweater. We fixed her up, though; she now has a Squirrel-crocheted sweater and hat. [Picture to come.]

*P.S. You will notice we didn't even get into anything really practical like clothes, but that's because we were hungry. We'll go back another time when we're feeling a bit more patient.*
Labels:
barbie,
Barbie doll,
crocheting,
dolls,
Frugality,
Thrift Shop,
thrift store,
Ty Teeny Beanie Boppers

## Sunday, February 22, 2009

### Think About It

Quick quiz: what's February 22nd if you're a Brownie? Or a Scout or Guide or...

*Photo found at SparklesGarden.com.*
Labels:
Brownies

## Friday, February 20, 2009

### What's all that CPSIA have to do with us anyway?

Sent via a homeschool list: the link to a Canadian bookselling company that will no longer ship to the U.S.

That's one way the CPSIA affects Canadian businesses: our American customers for "suspect" children's products have been eliminated.

And I assume the same would apply to E-bay sellers. I had been thinking of selling our 1965 set of My Book House (before Crayons strenuously objected), but now I wouldn't be able to ship it across the border.

Right?

P.S. I'm also envisioning a small army of elderly church-bazaar crafters converging on the White House, brandishing knitting needles and hot glue guns. Or check out these "chicks with sticks." (That blog is no longer current, I just liked the photos; click here for current Knitters = Angry Mob posts.)

That's one way the CPSIA affects Canadian businesses: our American customers for "suspect" children's products have been eliminated.

And I assume the same would apply to E-bay sellers. I had been thinking of selling our 1965 set of My Book House (before Crayons strenuously objected), but now I wouldn't be able to ship it across the border.

Right?

P.S. I'm also envisioning a small army of elderly church-bazaar crafters converging on the White House, brandishing knitting needles and hot glue guns. Or check out these "chicks with sticks." (That blog is no longer current, I just liked the photos; click here for current Knitters = Angry Mob posts.)

Labels:
CPSIA

## Thursday, February 19, 2009

### A question of loyalty: Rough Crossings (Books read in 2009)

This was on my library to-read list for this year, and it was with some satisfaction that I ticked it off as read, all 399 pages of it. Whew. History books aren't always on my free-reading list.

But I'm really glad I read this one. It may have been long, but it wasn't tough reading. Simon Schama knows how to bring characters to life--and that can be tough when they all seem to be guys in white wigs.

What happened to the fairly large black population in the Thirteen Colonies--free blacks, escaped slaves, and people who were still "owned"--during and after the American War of Independence?

I realize that I'm reading this book from a different perspective than a lot of you. In my school lessons, the Loyalists were (more or less) the good guys--after all, without them, Canadian history would have been very different. (This book contains a fair amount of Canadian history as well as British and American, particularly the parts about black loyalists attempting to settle in Nova Scotia.) Some Americans might get quite annoyed with the idea that some of the most famous Patriots seem to have done the most to hold back the rights of black Americans; as the book points out, they emphasized Liberty, but that didn't necessarily include people of colour. Simon Schama seems like the perfect historian to try and cover this part of the story without bias on either side: he's from the U.K. but teaches at Columbia University.

As the New York Times review said, the book gives you a good look at how the American Revolution got all tangled up with British abolitionism. It's about making promises and then having no idea how you're going to keep them. Mainly, in this case, to the great numbers of free blacks and escaped slaves who fought for the British during the War of Independence, after being promised freedom and/or land in return for their loyalty. It's about who qualifies as citizens, or subjects, with all the rights and freedoms that go along with that status--and what happens when a group of people insist on those rights even if it's inconvenient.

It's about finding someone to blame when things go wrong.

Well, the British never figured on losing the war, right?

I like the New York Times review of this book; I think it summarizes most of the main points of the book pretty well. The Amazon reviews are more mixed, but they're harder to take seriously; some of the low-scoring reviews seem to be based on incorrect information, such as the idea that Great Britain had actually passed a law against slavery by the time the Revolution started. That misunderstanding actually caused some of the problems during the war itself: there was a court case which made transporting a slave out of the country (against his will) illegal; this gave a lot of people the impression that slavery had been outlawed in Britain, which wasn't technically true.

In the end, I don't think anybody really comes out as Superman in this story. Granville Sharp and John Clarkson come pretty close, at least if good intentions count for something. But even they had their blind spots and made mistakes.

I found the book to be--amazingly--very fair and respectful to people (both black and white) with strong Christian beliefs. In our current age there is a tendency to downplay the influence that religious beliefs have on history; in this case, that would be almost impossible since Christian faith--though in many varieties--motivated many of the key people in this story. It makes a good, although perhaps unintended, point that just belonging to the right church or holding a certain set of beliefs doesn't always mean that someone will make the right decisions, act intelligently, or even show compassion.

Highly recommended reading for homeschooled highschool students, and anyone else.

But I'm really glad I read this one. It may have been long, but it wasn't tough reading. Simon Schama knows how to bring characters to life--and that can be tough when they all seem to be guys in white wigs.

What happened to the fairly large black population in the Thirteen Colonies--free blacks, escaped slaves, and people who were still "owned"--during and after the American War of Independence?

I realize that I'm reading this book from a different perspective than a lot of you. In my school lessons, the Loyalists were (more or less) the good guys--after all, without them, Canadian history would have been very different. (This book contains a fair amount of Canadian history as well as British and American, particularly the parts about black loyalists attempting to settle in Nova Scotia.) Some Americans might get quite annoyed with the idea that some of the most famous Patriots seem to have done the most to hold back the rights of black Americans; as the book points out, they emphasized Liberty, but that didn't necessarily include people of colour. Simon Schama seems like the perfect historian to try and cover this part of the story without bias on either side: he's from the U.K. but teaches at Columbia University.

As the New York Times review said, the book gives you a good look at how the American Revolution got all tangled up with British abolitionism. It's about making promises and then having no idea how you're going to keep them. Mainly, in this case, to the great numbers of free blacks and escaped slaves who fought for the British during the War of Independence, after being promised freedom and/or land in return for their loyalty. It's about who qualifies as citizens, or subjects, with all the rights and freedoms that go along with that status--and what happens when a group of people insist on those rights even if it's inconvenient.

It's about finding someone to blame when things go wrong.

Well, the British never figured on losing the war, right?

I like the New York Times review of this book; I think it summarizes most of the main points of the book pretty well. The Amazon reviews are more mixed, but they're harder to take seriously; some of the low-scoring reviews seem to be based on incorrect information, such as the idea that Great Britain had actually passed a law against slavery by the time the Revolution started. That misunderstanding actually caused some of the problems during the war itself: there was a court case which made transporting a slave out of the country (against his will) illegal; this gave a lot of people the impression that slavery had been outlawed in Britain, which wasn't technically true.

In the end, I don't think anybody really comes out as Superman in this story. Granville Sharp and John Clarkson come pretty close, at least if good intentions count for something. But even they had their blind spots and made mistakes.

I found the book to be--amazingly--very fair and respectful to people (both black and white) with strong Christian beliefs. In our current age there is a tendency to downplay the influence that religious beliefs have on history; in this case, that would be almost impossible since Christian faith--though in many varieties--motivated many of the key people in this story. It makes a good, although perhaps unintended, point that just belonging to the right church or holding a certain set of beliefs doesn't always mean that someone will make the right decisions, act intelligently, or even show compassion.

Highly recommended reading for homeschooled highschool students, and anyone else.

Labels:
Books Read in 2009,
Canada,
history

### You too can be a leftover queen

Found via a post on the Homeschool Math Blog: LoveFoodHateWaste.com. Check out the recipes: Food-processor banana ice cream (we have done this for years), Roast Dinner Soup, Le Pudding. The only drawback (from this vantage point) is that it's a British site--so be warned, your mileage on taste and measurement may vary.

### A mathematical shawl? (Crocheting)

Moebius Shawl/Scarf Pattern.

*Found through Tori's post at We Keep Choosing Us Thanks for stopping by!*
Labels:
crocheting

## Wednesday, February 18, 2009

### We get it. Why don't they? (CPSIA)

The Common Room checks in with another post that will take you awhile to read if you click on all those links.

Short version: Mainstream media, including the New York Times, just don't seem to understand what a Pandora's Box has been opened with the CPSIA (sorry for the passive but I couldn't make it come out right otherwise). The media voices say things like, "This legislation isn't meant to affect libraries" or "thrift shops" or whatever; but that's exactly what it does do. As the DHM points out, many of these voices don't seem to be even as well informed as some of the "mom bloggers" out there. Or the small businesses who have already closed their doors.

No wonder people are so confused.

Short version: Mainstream media, including the New York Times, just don't seem to understand what a Pandora's Box has been opened with the CPSIA (sorry for the passive but I couldn't make it come out right otherwise). The media voices say things like, "This legislation isn't meant to affect libraries" or "thrift shops" or whatever; but that's exactly what it does do. As the DHM points out, many of these voices don't seem to be even as well informed as some of the "mom bloggers" out there. Or the small businesses who have already closed their doors.

No wonder people are so confused.

Labels:
CPSIA,
thrift store

### Manifesto from a vintage childrens' book lover (CPSIA)

Vintage Kids' Books My Kid Loves speaks out on the effects of the CPSIA.

"So... a bag of plastic "MADE IN CHINA" animals from Walmart is good and your mother's favorite book from childhood is toxic until proven innocent. If you want to help stop this insanity, check out the Handmade Toy Alliance and contact your congressman.

"As for me, I will continue buying, collecting and giving vintage kids' books to my child. I will continue writing about them here every day. And as I sit and watch my son mouth a rubber frog from China that is filled with who knows what, I can't help but think the world has gone slightly mad this week."--"The Death of Vintage Kids' Books"

### Who's Invited to our 4th Blogiversary Party?

It's today.

And you are!

On the guest list:

The Composite Ghost (Ponytails' Perfect Superhero) and The Commodore Frog

Ty Teenie Beany Boppers

John Wesley

Liona Boyd

Punky Pumpkin (don't ask)

Barbie and her bowling buddies

And all the Treehouse friends!

For entertainment, we have:

Three Stooges Movies

Answering Ponytails' Annual Winter Quiz

Writing poems about things that BOTHER us

Sea Songs With Crayons

Fun Israel activities

Discussion (serious and otherwise) of the names of IKEA chairs, Stickleback parenting habits, freaky homeskoolers, the etiquette of not touching somebody else's fish, grammar grabbers, and God's provision.

On the menu:

Sausage-Barley Soup

Granola bars that don't fall apart

Doreen Perry's Cookies

Tofu Chocolate Pie

Happy Blogiversary! Enjoy the party!

And, one day late--happy blog birthday to The Beehive Five too.

And you are!

On the guest list:

The Composite Ghost (Ponytails' Perfect Superhero) and The Commodore Frog

Ty Teenie Beany Boppers

John Wesley

Liona Boyd

Punky Pumpkin (don't ask)

Barbie and her bowling buddies

And all the Treehouse friends!

For entertainment, we have:

Three Stooges Movies

Answering Ponytails' Annual Winter Quiz

Writing poems about things that BOTHER us

Sea Songs With Crayons

Fun Israel activities

Discussion (serious and otherwise) of the names of IKEA chairs, Stickleback parenting habits, freaky homeskoolers, the etiquette of not touching somebody else's fish, grammar grabbers, and God's provision.

On the menu:

Sausage-Barley Soup

Granola bars that don't fall apart

Doreen Perry's Cookies

Tofu Chocolate Pie

Happy Blogiversary! Enjoy the party!

And, one day late--happy blog birthday to The Beehive Five too.

Labels:
barbie,
Barbie doll,
blogaversary,
Blogs,
Blogworld,
Family,
Quizzes,
Treehouse,
Ty Teeny Beanie Boppers

## Tuesday, February 17, 2009

### Taking the hoppity out (CPSIA)

Want to read more about the CPSIA? Can you stand it?

I think all this would take the hoppity hop even out of the ebullient Christopher Robin (whose toys, doubtless full of contaminants, are pictured above).

Labels:
CPSIA

## Monday, February 16, 2009

### A true autodidact, or, that's what you call an extended library loan

*"Q Rocks."--*

*Queen Shenayay*

*, sometime during the last decade*

"Q (Quiller-Couch) was all by himself my college education. I went down to the public library one day when I was seventeen looking for books on the art of writing, and found five books of lectures which Q had delivered to his students of writing at Cambridge.

"'Just what I need!' I congratulated myself. I hurried home with the first volume and started reading and got to page 3 and hit a snag:

"Q....assumed that his students--including me--had read

*Paradise Lost*as a matter of course and would understand his analysis of the 'Invocation to Light' in Book 9. So I said, 'Wait here,' and went down the library and got

*Paradise Lost*and took it home and started reading it and got to page 3, when I hit a snag:

"Milton assumed I'd read the Christian version of Isaiah and the New Testament and had learned all about Lucifer and the War in Heaven, and since I'd been reared in Judaism I hadn't. So I said, 'Wait here,' and borrowed a Christian Bible and read about Lucifer and so forth, and then went back to Milton and read

*Paradise Lost*, and then finally got back to Q, page 3.....[I] discovered he assumed I not only knew all the plays of Shakespeare, and Boswell's

*Johnson*, but also the Second Book of Esdras....So what with one thing and another and an average of three 'Wait here's' a week, it took me eleven years to get through Q's five books of lectures."

--Helene Hanff,

*The Duchess of Bloomsbury Street*, 1974

Labels:
Books

## Sunday, February 15, 2009

### Best Retro-Style Valentine's Day

Listening to Isaac Hayes' Hot Buttered Soul with Mr. Fixit. (Mr. Fixit went to the old-record store yesterday.)

We're nothing if not eclectic.

We're nothing if not eclectic.

Labels:
Mr. Fixit,
music,
St. Valentine's Day

## Friday, February 13, 2009

### Why HSLDA is getting it wrong (CPSIA)

Valerie Jacobsen at The Bookroom explains, point by point. This is her last point, and it's something to think about:

"Finally, think about this…. HSLDA exists for the purpose of protecting families from federal and state aggression for the legal act of homeschooling. Since HSLDA does have a legitimate purpose for its own existence, it seems a little odd to presume that no families need protection from federal and state aggression if they do, in fact, commit illegal acts. If a law was passed that made homeschooling “technically illegal,” with fines and jail terms attached, I think HSLDA would be flooding the Internet with Calls to Action, enforcement promises notwithstanding."

(Hat tip to Sebastian.)

"Finally, think about this…. HSLDA exists for the purpose of protecting families from federal and state aggression for the legal act of homeschooling. Since HSLDA does have a legitimate purpose for its own existence, it seems a little odd to presume that no families need protection from federal and state aggression if they do, in fact, commit illegal acts. If a law was passed that made homeschooling “technically illegal,” with fines and jail terms attached, I think HSLDA would be flooding the Internet with Calls to Action, enforcement promises notwithstanding."

(Hat tip to Sebastian.)

Labels:
CPSIA

### February Reading List

In January I was very disciplined. I read one book, then I started another one. This month I keep starting books and then starting other ones. Sometimes it's more fun that way.

I'm crossing them out as they get done.

The Heart of Mid-Lothian, by Sir Walter Scott

Discover Your Inner Economist, by Tyler Cowen

~~Rough Crossings, by Simon Schama~~

Godric, by Frederick Buechner

Plutarch's Life of Theseus

Deep River, by Shusaku Endo

The Maytrees, by Annie Dillard

~~Rebels of the Heavenly Kingdom, by Katherine Paterson~~

I'm crossing them out as they get done.

*Already reading:*The Heart of Mid-Lothian, by Sir Walter Scott

Discover Your Inner Economist, by Tyler Cowen

Godric, by Frederick Buechner

Plutarch's Life of Theseus

Deep River, by Shusaku Endo

*Waiting to start:*The Maytrees, by Annie Dillard

### Another bill (CPSIA)

Too much for this little squirrel brain to fathom this early in the morning.

Something to chew on (assuming it's lead-free):

"Maybe it’s good to make reselling old children’s clothing illegal, if the clasps might have lead. Maybe thrift store shopping for children should become a thing of the past, because it’s too hazardous to life and limb. But, to repeat, I haven’t actually seen anyone 1) argue that the law shouldn’t, as written, have these really very sweeping effects; 2) argue that, even if it does, on balance it’s still a good law."--Blogpost "Toy Story II" at Out of the Crooked Timber

Something to chew on (assuming it's lead-free):

"Maybe it’s good to make reselling old children’s clothing illegal, if the clasps might have lead. Maybe thrift store shopping for children should become a thing of the past, because it’s too hazardous to life and limb. But, to repeat, I haven’t actually seen anyone 1) argue that the law shouldn’t, as written, have these really very sweeping effects; 2) argue that, even if it does, on balance it’s still a good law."--Blogpost "Toy Story II" at Out of the Crooked Timber

Labels:
CPSIA,
thrift store

### Lore Rasmussen has passed away

Lore Rasmussen was the creator of Miquon Math, and a woman who led a very interesting life besides. More here.

Labels:
Lore Rasmussen,
Miquon Math

## Thursday, February 12, 2009

### A note of discouragement (or, I need some chocolate)

The background on this: a study published by the Heart and Stroke Foundation "highlighting the issue of access to cheap and nutritious food." If healthy foods like apples and brown rice are more expensive in certain parts of our country, then we're more likely to substitute cheap pop and chips. So the thinking goes.

An editorial in the local paper comments that our area "enjoys fairly modest food prices" but that "Such [market] forces are in play, one suspects, in the news that brown rice and dried beans are hard to find and pricey in many parts of Canada. It's probably safe to say such foods are not something many people are shopping for in many parts of the country." In other words, maybe dried beans are sometimes expensive because there is little demand for them?

Oh gosh, that's sad. But it seems that's the truth: that all the Frugal Hacks out there, though the blogroll seems long, are really a small percentage of grocery consumers. The bean eaters are hugely outnumbered by the pop tart buyers. We can post all the lentil casseroles we want on our blogs, but the reality is that most people--not necessarily our friends, but the vast majority--will either turn up their noses or have absolutely no idea what a lentil is or what you do with it.

I got a flash of this same thinking when I watched the video about pulling stuff off thrift shop shelves. "Pre-1985 books" were mentioned with as little concern as if they were pre-1985 potty trainers or pre-1985 typewriter repair manuals--as if they really were suspect or useless items that should be discarded--and I thought, I bet the majority of people watching it don't even think that matters. Who's interested in pre-1985 books anyway? They might be a bit more concerned about the fact that most of the kids' jeans and coats will be gone from the racks, but that's a real, practical issue. A kids' book is a kids' book, it's a thing with pictures, who cares if our kids are limited to post-1985 printings?

If you're reading this, the odds are you do care. Those who don't see things that way probably aren't bothering to read a mom blogger who gets too emotional over old pieces of paper glued between covers.

I know I'm among friends here.

But it does get discouraging.

An editorial in the local paper comments that our area "enjoys fairly modest food prices" but that "Such [market] forces are in play, one suspects, in the news that brown rice and dried beans are hard to find and pricey in many parts of Canada. It's probably safe to say such foods are not something many people are shopping for in many parts of the country." In other words, maybe dried beans are sometimes expensive because there is little demand for them?

Oh gosh, that's sad. But it seems that's the truth: that all the Frugal Hacks out there, though the blogroll seems long, are really a small percentage of grocery consumers. The bean eaters are hugely outnumbered by the pop tart buyers. We can post all the lentil casseroles we want on our blogs, but the reality is that most people--not necessarily our friends, but the vast majority--will either turn up their noses or have absolutely no idea what a lentil is or what you do with it.

I got a flash of this same thinking when I watched the video about pulling stuff off thrift shop shelves. "Pre-1985 books" were mentioned with as little concern as if they were pre-1985 potty trainers or pre-1985 typewriter repair manuals--as if they really were suspect or useless items that should be discarded--and I thought, I bet the majority of people watching it don't even think that matters. Who's interested in pre-1985 books anyway? They might be a bit more concerned about the fact that most of the kids' jeans and coats will be gone from the racks, but that's a real, practical issue. A kids' book is a kids' book, it's a thing with pictures, who cares if our kids are limited to post-1985 printings?

If you're reading this, the odds are you do care. Those who don't see things that way probably aren't bothering to read a mom blogger who gets too emotional over old pieces of paper glued between covers.

I know I'm among friends here.

But it does get discouraging.

Labels:
Books,
CPSIA,
groceries,
thrift store,
Tracking grocery prices

### Going to the Dogs

From the Maiden America website:

"Maiden America’s Handmade Hair Accessories are Temporarily UNAVAILABLE for purchase for CHILDREN – you may purchase barrettes ONLY FOR YOUR DOGS."

"Maiden America’s Handmade Hair Accessories are Temporarily UNAVAILABLE for purchase for CHILDREN – you may purchase barrettes ONLY FOR YOUR DOGS."

Labels:
CPSIA

### Abraham Lincoln Rap

This song is pretty entertaining. Good pictures, too.

"Then I met my wife Mary,

She would help me out when times got scary."

"Then I met my wife Mary,

She would help me out when times got scary."

### Now this video I just don't get (CPSIA)

*A news segment about Goodwill pulling stuff off the shelves*

*--and check out the little exchange between the newscasters at the end.*

The news item makes it sound like ALL THOSE ITEMS contain lead. That it's all about recalls and health and responsibility. That all that's happened is that there are new levels of product safety out there, isn't that nice?

It makes it sound like the fact that "They're out there watching" (last line) is a Good Thing.

Something about that, I just don't get.

Labels:
CPSIA

### More CPSIA fallout, with a video

Overlawyered posts about what's happening in thrift shops and other resellers of children's products. (Found through Melissa's Twitter page.) (I can't get the video to load here, but maybe it's a Canada thing.)

Labels:
CPSIA,
Overlawyered,
thrift store

## Wednesday, February 11, 2009

### Eat your lentils

Cents to Get Free has her own twist on the Brown Rice-Lentil Casserole. (She credits Recipezaar for the basic recipe, but I think it was originally printed in one of the

*Tightwad Gazette*books.)### And now for something completely different

Gayle at Grocery Cart Challenge has some Ladies' Unmentionables (no, not underwear, the other unmentionables) to give away, courtesy of the DivaCup people. Leave her a comment and you could win. (Canadians are eligible too.)

There, that's one subject that I don't think we've ever covered here.

There, that's one subject that I don't think we've ever covered here.

Labels:
Blogworld,
Grocery Cart Challenge Blog

### The fallout (CPSIA)

I found this article that links to some of the Common Room's CPSIA articles as well as comments by Valerie Jacobsen (here, here). (Valerie's Living Books)

What bothers me almost as much as all this is what seems--from this little corner of Ontario--to be almost complete lack of media coverage of this legislation. There's been nothing in our paper about it, that I can see. Maybe the Toronto papers have more, I don't know.

What bothers me almost as much as all this is what seems--from this little corner of Ontario--to be almost complete lack of media coverage of this legislation. There's been nothing in our paper about it, that I can see. Maybe the Toronto papers have more, I don't know.

Labels:
CPSIA

## Tuesday, February 10, 2009

### Mrs. DHM and the Bad Squirrels: A Fable

Mrs. DHM was a little brown squirrel who lived in the tip, tip, top of a tall Common Room House. She didn't like to cook (well, sometimes she did), but she did like to move furniture and blog and teach her children, and she liked to sing while she worked.

Every morning Mrs. DHM made herself a bowl of crockpot cereal, and as she stirred it around she sang:

"Oh, I love to cook, I love to bake,

I guess I'll make an acorn cake and send it to Mama Squirrel."

Then she dusted her wooden toys and rinsed her mason jars and put her whole house in order.

At night Mrs. DHM climbed into her bed and looked through the topmost branches at the sky. She saw a million stars. She looked at her bookshelves and saw a million books, most pre-1985. It was very peaceful.

But one day a band of red squirrels came jumping and chattering to the Common Room House. Mrs. DHM was just putting her cake in the oven, when she looked up and saw a lot of strangers in her doorway. One, two, three, she counted, and one, two three more--six red squirrels. She didn't think they were there for the singing.

Then they told her she couldn't sell her used books online anymore. They drank up her whole winter's supply of Russian Tea. They broke her broom and threw out her mason jars. Then they chased her out of her Common Room house.

Poor Mrs. DHM! She didn't know where to go. And it began to rain. She scampered up the nearest tree with her laptop. Shivering and cold, she scrambled down a chimney and out of a hole in the chimney and into the attic.

There in the dusty, quiet attic she saw a beautiful sight. The whole attic was full of vintage children's books. Bound volumes of St. Nicholas Magazine. Entire shelves of Childhood of Famous Americans. First editions of Edward Ardizzone's Little Tim books.

"My, what a lovely attic!" thought Mrs. DHM. "What a shame there is no one to share it with me. It is so big!" She catalogued two whole bookcases on Library Thing.

Then she saw a box and opened it up. Well, what do you think she saw inside? A band of toy soldiers. They had been sleeping there for years.

"Thanks for setting us free," said the captain. "Is there anything we can do for you?"

"You could march to the Common Room," said Mrs. DHM, "and talk to those red squirrels who pushed me out. But, on the other hand, we don't want to use unnecessary force. How about you stay here instead and I'll read you stories."

"As long as we don't have to narrate afterwards," said the soldier captain.

Late that night the captain woke his men and gave them their orders. There were only five of them, but they were very brave, and their hearts were full of love. After all, Mrs. DHM had introduced them to The Bears of Blue River.

They marched to the Common Room and climbed through the window. The squirrels were making so much noise about government bailouts that they did not hear the soldiers until it was too late.

"This is Mrs. DHM's house," said the captain, drawing his sword. "Will you go peaceably, or must we fight?"

The red squirrels looked at the soldiers and screamed "Lead! Contaminants!" They ran out of the house as fast as they could and down the road.

"And don't come back!" shouted the captain.

Mrs. DHM was very happy to move back into her Common Room. She thanked the soldiers and made them promise to come for potluck dinners once a week. Then the soldiers marched off through the forest, singing The Cruel War.

That night when Mrs. DHM went to bed, she was very tired. And she still missed her Sadie dog. But she looked through the branches and she could see a million stars. She looked at her bookshelves and she could see a million books. And she looked through her blog comments and realized that she had...well, not a million friends...but a lot. And Mrs. DHM was very happy once more.

Every morning Mrs. DHM made herself a bowl of crockpot cereal, and as she stirred it around she sang:

"Oh, I love to cook, I love to bake,

I guess I'll make an acorn cake and send it to Mama Squirrel."

Then she dusted her wooden toys and rinsed her mason jars and put her whole house in order.

At night Mrs. DHM climbed into her bed and looked through the topmost branches at the sky. She saw a million stars. She looked at her bookshelves and saw a million books, most pre-1985. It was very peaceful.

But one day a band of red squirrels came jumping and chattering to the Common Room House. Mrs. DHM was just putting her cake in the oven, when she looked up and saw a lot of strangers in her doorway. One, two, three, she counted, and one, two three more--six red squirrels. She didn't think they were there for the singing.

Then they told her she couldn't sell her used books online anymore. They drank up her whole winter's supply of Russian Tea. They broke her broom and threw out her mason jars. Then they chased her out of her Common Room house.

Poor Mrs. DHM! She didn't know where to go. And it began to rain. She scampered up the nearest tree with her laptop. Shivering and cold, she scrambled down a chimney and out of a hole in the chimney and into the attic.

There in the dusty, quiet attic she saw a beautiful sight. The whole attic was full of vintage children's books. Bound volumes of St. Nicholas Magazine. Entire shelves of Childhood of Famous Americans. First editions of Edward Ardizzone's Little Tim books.

"My, what a lovely attic!" thought Mrs. DHM. "What a shame there is no one to share it with me. It is so big!" She catalogued two whole bookcases on Library Thing.

Then she saw a box and opened it up. Well, what do you think she saw inside? A band of toy soldiers. They had been sleeping there for years.

"Thanks for setting us free," said the captain. "Is there anything we can do for you?"

"You could march to the Common Room," said Mrs. DHM, "and talk to those red squirrels who pushed me out. But, on the other hand, we don't want to use unnecessary force. How about you stay here instead and I'll read you stories."

"As long as we don't have to narrate afterwards," said the soldier captain.

Late that night the captain woke his men and gave them their orders. There were only five of them, but they were very brave, and their hearts were full of love. After all, Mrs. DHM had introduced them to The Bears of Blue River.

They marched to the Common Room and climbed through the window. The squirrels were making so much noise about government bailouts that they did not hear the soldiers until it was too late.

"This is Mrs. DHM's house," said the captain, drawing his sword. "Will you go peaceably, or must we fight?"

The red squirrels looked at the soldiers and screamed "Lead! Contaminants!" They ran out of the house as fast as they could and down the road.

"And don't come back!" shouted the captain.

Mrs. DHM was very happy to move back into her Common Room. She thanked the soldiers and made them promise to come for potluck dinners once a week. Then the soldiers marched off through the forest, singing The Cruel War.

That night when Mrs. DHM went to bed, she was very tired. And she still missed her Sadie dog. But she looked through the branches and she could see a million stars. She looked at her bookshelves and she could see a million books. And she looked through her blog comments and realized that she had...well, not a million friends...but a lot. And Mrs. DHM was very happy once more.

*With Apologies to Miriam Young and her classic picture book Miss Suzy, copyright 1964 by Parent's Magazine Press, now classified as an illegal substance.*### Up in smoke (CPSIA)

Are all the people happy now who said we were just making too big a fuss over this?

The pen is mightier than the brain.

And in the meantime, articles like this one might actually make you think the CPSIA is a

The pen is mightier than the brain.

And in the meantime, articles like this one might actually make you think the CPSIA is a

*good*thing.
Labels:
CPSIA

## Monday, February 09, 2009

### Books Read in 2009: Silence

*Silence*, by Shusaku Endo (also here)

*Silence*isn't a pleasure read, any more than you read

*The Power and the Glory*or

*Heart of Darkness*just for fun. But Terry Glaspey and Philip Yancey both said I should read this book, so I took it out of the library.

I avoided starting it. I left it to the bottom of the stack as long as I could. Finally I read it.

Even in translation, Silence is an excellent book, though so difficult to continue reading. The characters are strong, and the technique of writing much of the book as letters works; in fact, I think that the first-person parts of the book work the best. (The last section shifts to the third person.)

The main character is Father Rodrigues, a Portuguese Jesuit of the 17th century, who arrives in Japan interested not so much in converts as he is in looking for news of his seminary professor, Ferreira, who is said to have apostatized after being tortured. (Reminds me a bit of Conrad's character looking for Kurtz.) Things rapidly go from bad to worse for Rodrigues. The Christian peasants he encounters are starving and terrified; the government has a "zero tolerance" policy on Roman Catholicism and particularly on priests. After a period of hiding and running, Rodrigues is arrested, and from that point on he is pitted, physically, psychologically, and spiritually against one man: Inoue, the magistrate and leader of the anti-Christian forces. That's good storytelling; the strongest battle stories always come down to one on one.

And that's the toughest part of this story for Rodrigues; he, reasonably, starts to feel like he is facing all of this on his own, without any help from God. He sees few miracles, and much to make him doubt. Why does God seem to be silent?

*Silence*is about the impact both the evangelization and the persecution have on a particular society. It's about how someone's pride and faith are torn to the point of allowing him to do what he never thought he could stoop to do: apostatizing (denying his faith). (I'm not giving much away here, all you have to do is read the endpapers.) Endo suggests an alternative interpretation: perhaps the act of apostatizing, in this situation, was actually an act of faith.

Japanese Catholics criticized

*Silence*when it was first published. They didn't want to read about a fallen priest; they would have preferred to hear about martyrs and glorious deaths. Others took the theme of the book to be the problem of Christianity as a Western faith being imposed, unsuccessfully, on Eastern minds. Endo insisted that he was writing literature, not theology, and I don't think he was wrong about that, although many theological discussions could come out of the book.

Finally, there's an extra reason to read this book soon. The only film version was made in Japanese in 1971; but Martin Scorsese has a new version in production, starring Daniel Day Lewis and planned for release in 2010.

Labels:
Books Read in 2009,
Christianity,
Shusaku Endo

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)